The is and oughts of remembering
Erik Myin

In this paper, I will offer a view of remembering inspired by REC—the
Radical Enactive/Embodied view of cognition proposed recently by Dan Hutto
and myself. According to the view I’ll defend, all memory is, ultimately, a
form of knowhow. Explicit memory, though not fundamentally different from
procedural memory, can be shown to be a special kind of procedural memory.
Only some forms of explicit memory are subject to the special kind of
normativity of being assessable for truth or falsity (or equivalent
notions). But such involving of content requires the presence of special
socio-culturally developed practices of truth-telling. There are other
mnemonic values, constitutively enabled by a variety of sociocultural
practices whose primary aim is not epistemic. All mnemonic values are
pragmatic and context sensitive. I’ll show how my view leaves no room for
memory skepticism,  and will detail how it construes the link between
remembering and imagining.

26 November 2020
10:30-12:00 CET (UTC+01:00)

Zoom link :
https://univ-grenoble-alpes-fr.zoom.us/j/99070420986?pwd=Nk8rT1JHY2NYZEE4TjUwandmRVdmQT09
meeting ID : 990 7042 0986
secret code : 745201

The talk takes place in the Institut de Philosophie de Grenoble's
international seminar. More info :
https://iphig.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/fr/actualites/and-oughts-remembering.

All welcome!

--
Kourken Michaelian
http://phil-mem.org/

--
https://www.vidal-rosset.net/mailing_list_educasupphilo.html
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        

Répondre à