Please circulate this announcement in your lab

December 12th 2019, 14h00-16h00
Bordeaux Functional Genomics Center (CGFB), lecture room

Ana Soto (Tufts University, USA / ENS Paris, France)

"Carcinogenesis explained within the context of a theory of organisms"

A PhilInBioMed seminar

Open to all
 
Ana Soto is a principal investigator at Tufts University in Boston, USA, and in 
2013 she was Blaise Pascal Chair of Biology at the Ecole Normale Supérieur 
(ENS) de Paris, France. Together with Carlos Sonnenschein she discovered in 
1987 the mimetic action of estrogen by plastic products, so called endocrine 
disrupters. She is the first to show a link between breast cancer and exposure 
to bisphenol A, which led to a ban of the use of bisphenol A in food 
containers. Besides her interest in endocrine disruptors and carcinogenesis, 
Ana Soto is interested in cell proliferation, fetal origins of adult diseases, 
the role of stroma/epithelial interactions on organogenesis and carcinogenesis, 
as well as the role of biomechanics on morphogenesis.
 
ABSTRACT

Lacking an operational theory to explain the organization and behavior of 
matter in unicellular and multicellular organisms hinders progress in biology. 
Such a theory should address life cycles from ontogenesis to death. This theory 
would complement the theory of evolution that addresses phylogenesis, and would 
posit theoretical extensions to accepted physical principles and default states 
in order to grasp the living state of matter and define proper biological 
observables. The fundamental biological principles we proposed for the 
construction of a theory of organisms are: a) the default state (proliferation 
with variation and motility, Soto et al, 2016), b) the principle of 
organization which addresses the generation and maintenance of stability by 
closure of constraints, (Mossio et al., 2016) and c) the principle of 
variation, which is generated both at the cellular and supracellular levels 
(Montévil et al, 2016). Our experimental research and mathematical modeling 
effort
 s are guided by these principles.

For a century, the somatic mutation theory (SMT) has been the prevalent theory 
to explain carcinogenesis. According to the SMT, cancer is a cellular problem, 
and thus, the level of organization where it should be studied is the cellular 
level. Additionally, the SMT proposes that cancer is a problem of the control 
of cell proliferation and assumes that proliferative quiescence is the default 
state of cells in metazoa. In 1999, a competing theory, the tissue organization 
field theory (TOFT), was proposed. In contraposition to the SMT, the TOFT 
posits that cancer is a tissue-based disease whereby carcinogens (directly) and 
mutations in the germ-line (indirectly) alter the normal interactions between 
the diverse components of an organ, such as the stroma and its adjacent 
epithelium. The TOFT explicitly acknowledges that the default (unconstrained) 
state of all cells is proliferation with variation and motility.

When taking into consideration the principle of organization, we posit that 
carcinogenesis can be explained as a relational problem whereby release of the 
constraints created by cell interactions and the physical forces generated by 
cellular agency lead cells within a tissue to regain their default state of 
proliferation with variation and motility. Within this perspective, what 
matters both in morphogenesis and carcinogenesis is not only molecules, but 
also biophysical forces generated by cells and tissues. Herein, we describe how 
the principles for a theory of organisms apply to the TOFT and thus to the 
study of carcinogenesis.
More information here: https://www.philinbiomed.org/event/ana-soto/

--
Dr. Wiebke Bretting
Project Manager ERC IDEM
ImmunoConcEpT, UMR5164
Université de Bordeaux
146 rue Léo Saignat
33076 Bordeaux
https://www.immuconcept.org/erc-idem/

--
https://www.vidal-rosset.net/Mailing_list_educasupphilo.html
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        

Répondre à