Thanks for asking Shauna. 

I'd add a couple of requirements:

- not only should it be easy to search, it should also be indexed by Google. 
Any new, authoritative information needs to crowd out old, non-official links 
in Google search results. 
- all threads (and ideally, all comments) should be addressable by unique URL. 
This makes it a lot easier to point people to specific answers and conversations

- Peter







Peter Pinch |  Associate Director of Engineering, Office of Digital Learning
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
One Main Street  |  Cambridge MA 02142
E pdpi...@mit.edu | T 617-253-6256 | C 617-652-0183






> On Aug 2, 2016, at 3:43 PM, Shauna Gordon-McKeon <sgordon-mck...@edx.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hello Open edX community!
> 
> The open source team here at edX has been talking a lot recently about how we 
> can do a better job of making sure community members have access to the 
> resources you need to troubleshoot problems and get your questions answered.  
> Right now the most common avenues for getting support are our mailing lists 
> and Slack channels, but these tools don’t allow us to easily track frequently 
> asked questions or see how often questions are going unanswered.
> 
> We want to find a better tool so we can better help the community.  We’ve 
> brainstormed a list of requirements here: 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J0P2hNXH7hdyxbqi8OCndNrUoxrOXDAbvIGalG6v7qU/
>  
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J0P2hNXH7hdyxbqi8OCndNrUoxrOXDAbvIGalG6v7qU/>
> 
> Here’s where you come in: we can only see one side of the support experience. 
>  We don’t know what, from your perspective, the biggest problems are and the 
> most appealing solutions might be.  So please, feel free to suggest 
> additional requirements, and to let us know which of our existing 
> requirements are most important to you.  You can do so by adding to this 
> thread in the edx-code mailing list.
> 
> If you’ve got tool suggestions as well, we’d be happy to hear them!  Once 
> we’ve got our requirements list set, we’re going to evaluate the most 
> promising options.
> 
> Looking forward to seeing your feedback!
> 
> Best,
> Shauna
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "General Open edX discussion" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/edx-code/CAHZjGXuoR29%3DW6NnWsCBhTT33P8Yd6bUMtC6%3DvX3275R4tcExw%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/edx-code/CAHZjGXuoR29%3DW6NnWsCBhTT33P8Yd6bUMtC6%3DvX3275R4tcExw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"General Open edX discussion" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/edx-code/CDC90B80-AFFD-45A3-A444-9B06451BA153%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to