es. There are obvious security implications with that, and
> you should evaluate your security requirements before applying that
> setting.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Farzan Qureshi [mailto:fqure...@rosmini.school.nz]
> *Sent:* Thursday, 21 March 2013 11:21 AM
>
> *To:* efw-u
applying that setting.
From: Farzan Qureshi [mailto:fqure...@rosmini.school.nz]
Sent: Thursday, 21 March 2013 11:21 AM
To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Efw-user] Bandwidth and Thruput
Hi Herbert,
I was having similar issues with endian firewall at our end. I have done some
's or a Core i3+ to cope with all the
services on a 100/100mbit link.
Hope that's helpful.
From: compdoc [mailto:comp...@hotrodpc.com]
Sent: Thursday, 21 March 2013 12:43 AM
To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Efw-user] Bandwidth and Thruput
>the NICs are 3COM and Real
Hi Herbert,
I was having similar issues with endian firewall at our end. I have done
some modifications to the TCP/IP stack manually and some optimization to
dansguardian. It is working very well.
You can try following settings and hopefully this will fix your issues
because it did for us. Rememb
>the NICs are 3COM and Realtec 10/100MBit/s
>CPUload is about 80%
100baseT = 100 Mbps = 12.5 MBps
EFW depends on the speed of the host cpu and on the network cards. Because
of overhead and the limits of older computer buses and cpus, I don't believe
you will get much more than 7MBit/s usin
Can you please go to status and then connection and tell me what is the
maximum TTL you see on connections? Is it 119:00 ..something? ?
Farzan Qureshi
--
Rosmini College
Network Administrator & Helpdesk support
On 20/03/2013 7:58 PM, "Herbert Appel" wrote:
> Hello together,
>
>
Hi,
thanks for your hints - I´ll check.
Herbert
Am 20.03.2013 um 09:38 schrieb Andre Mueller:
>
> Hello Herbert
>
> If possible I would first try, only for testing purposes, to switch off
> the proxy functionality. Futher I would try to make "measurements" by
> placing a computer in the Red
?
>
> Regards
> Kevin
>
>
> Sent from Samsung Mobile
>
>
>
> Original message
> From: Herbert Appel
> Date:
> To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Efw-user] Bandwidth and Thruput
>
>
> Hello Andre,
>
> h
Hello Herbert
If possible I would first try, only for testing purposes, to switch off
the proxy functionality. Futher I would try to make "measurements" by
placing a computer in the Red subnet and by transferring large data
to/from by simple protocol to an other computer in the green subnet.
Hello Davo,
we used different methods:
1. www.speedtest.net
2. http://www.initiative-netzqualitaet.de
3. Download of a file (e. g.
http://www.ibc-blog.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/IBC-SOLAR_Jura-Solarpark.jpg)
7MB took 8-9s
greetings
Herbert
Am 20.03.2013 um 09:13 schrieb d.davo...@mastertrai
r CPU loads showing?
Regards
Kevin
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
From: Herbert Appel
Date:
To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Efw-user] Bandwidth and Thruput
Hello Andre,
hmm - but what could be the reason for that decrease from 50MBit/s --&g
I'm not sure about normality but can you tell how did you measure the
throughput?
Thanks
Davo
On 03/20/2013 07:40 AM, Herbert Appel wrote:
> Hello together,
>
> we use the latest version of EFW 2.51 in school.
> Since about one week we are connected to FTTH (FOS 100 as CPE) with 50MBit/s.
> On th
Hello Andre,
hmm - but what could be the reason for that decrease from 50MBit/s --> 7MBit/s?
Herbert
Am 20.03.2013 um 09:10 schrieb Andre Mueller:
>
> Hello Herbert
>
> We have FTTH with 50/10Mbits/s (waiting for 100/100) and are running EFW
> 2.5.1 Community Version as VM on VMware ESXi 4.1
Hello Herbert
We have FTTH with 50/10Mbits/s (waiting for 100/100) and are running EFW
2.5.1 Community Version as VM on VMware ESXi 4.1 on an single CPU board
with Quad Core Xeon L5630 2.13 GHz together with two other Web-Servers
VM's. Although we do not use any Proxy-functions (CLAVAV, AMAVIS
14 matches
Mail list logo
