Re: [eigen] Bitbucket migration

2019-09-12 Thread Christoph Hertzberg
On 12/09/2019 01.27, Gael Guennebaud wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 6:50 PM Christoph Hertzberg < c...@informatik.uni-bremen.de> wrote: [...] Did we actually plan to migrate bugzilla to gitlab-issues as well? Would we do this by just creating new issues with a link to the bz-archive? (This

Re: [eigen] Bitbucket migration

2019-09-12 Thread Joseph Mirabel
To summarize what is missing: - there are a lot of "backporting rev[0-9]+" that are not found. I don't know what "backporting" means. I just know that "hg log --rev N" for all the one I tested returns "unknown revision".   I guess I could fix most of them by adding some of the main developers

Re: [eigen] Bitbucket migration

2019-09-12 Thread Gael Guennebaud
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:59 AM David Tellenbach < david.tellenb...@tellnotes.org> wrote: > But is it our responsibility to archive such forks? There could be forks > for personal purpose only with no intend to create a PR at all. Should we > really bother to archive these? (At least) everyone

Re: [eigen] Bitbucket migration

2019-09-12 Thread Gael Guennebaud
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:53 AM Joseph Mirabel wrote: > To summarize what is missing: > > - there are a lot of "backporting rev[0-9]+" that are not found. I don't > know what "backporting" means. I just know that "hg log --rev N" for all > the one I tested returns "unknown revision". > $ hg log

Re: [eigen] Bitbucket migration

2019-09-12 Thread Gael Guennebaud
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:50 PM Christoph Hertzberg < c...@informatik.uni-bremen.de> wrote: > Small question, maybe I'm just missing it: > Did you actually translate the 3.x, 2.0 branches as well or just the > default/master branch? > I just ran the script, and all branches and tags are there,

Re: [eigen] Bitbucket migration

2019-09-12 Thread Gael Guennebaud
Excellent! Thanks a lot! Do you have a hash translation table in some form that I could use in the other scripts? gael On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:46 PM Joseph Mirabel wrote: > Hello Gael, > > I applied the changes you requested and force-pushed to > github.com/jmirabel/eigen_tmp > > Joseph > >

Re: [eigen] Bitbucket migration

2019-09-12 Thread Christoph Hertzberg
Small question, maybe I'm just missing it: Did you actually translate the 3.x, 2.0 branches as well or just the default/master branch? I'd actually be fine with filtering out all other named branches ... Also, is it possible to apply the tags (from ./.hgtags)? But I agree, great work!

Re: [eigen] Bitbucket migration

2019-09-12 Thread Christoph Hertzberg
Ah sorry, I should have tried that locally myself :) Christoph On 12/09/2019 17.18, Gael Guennebaud wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:50 PM Christoph Hertzberg < c...@informatik.uni-bremen.de> wrote: Small question, maybe I'm just missing it: Did you actually translate the 3.x, 2.0 branches

Re: [eigen] Bitbucket migration

2019-09-12 Thread Joseph Mirabel
I added a commit on my fork of fast-export which generate a file with lines as hg_rev_number hg_hash git_hash I pushed it to https://github.com/jmirabel/eigen_tmp/blob/master/hg2git-map Obviously, it should be put in another place. fast-export can also add hg hashes as notes to git commits.