Thanks Yannick, very informative
Yannick wrote(excerpts):
I assume he was referring to a SIP proxy, ... can solve the NAT issue.
...we could improve the ekiga tools for supporting NAT with an ICE...
...I doubt IPV6 will solve this issue...
fred
___
e
Le jeudi 05 septembre 2013 à 14:21 +0900, fred k a écrit :
> > ... you do *not* have [to] do/know all that if you use a
> commercial...
> I have a question. When you use commercial SIP provider, do you mean
> your voice/video/data goes through a server at the SIP provider before
> reaching called p
Hi That Guy and all gals and guys,
Let me discern technical issues and non-tech ones. Plus a question regarding "SIP
provider" at the bottom.
That Guy wrote:
$kype will continue to have a long LONG life of spying ahead.
I agree but this is not a technical issue here.
...the chances that th
On 09/04/2013 10:46 AM, That Guy wrote:
snip
WOW! OK I don't feel so dumb anymore and it is clear to me why none of
these have caught on and why people still use $kype. If this is what
you've got to do/understand to get an FOSS VoIP client up and running
I'm guessing that $kype will continue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
snip
>> You either hard code the LAN ip address to forward your SIP traffic,
>> or you have to configure your router to dynamically configure the
>> required ports to the LAN ip address which opens port 3478 or 3479, if
>> possible.
>>
>> I am pret
