Hi Joe.
Yes, I am also awaiting this firmware update. I have not yet got my K3, but
my hopes are that it will be ready soon. Right now I am also using the
IC-756pro3, microphone are the TSM MT-57 dynamic, and I use the W2IHY
equalizer into the rear ACC connector. I have also ordered a better
Hi.
I am awaiting my new K3 but I wanted it to be shipped with all the options
including the DVR (Digital Voice Recorder) installed, so I have to wait.
Are there any news on the progress/release date on the DVR ?
Best regards
LA4AMA
Roar
--
View this message in context:
* SSB TRANSMIT BANDPASS EXTENDED AT LOW END. Improvement
is about 2 dB at 300 Hz, 3 dB at 200 Hz, and 6 dB at 100 Hz.
Can this be made optional? Excess LF response only wastes
power at low frequencies and occupies excess bandwidth.
We could add a menu entry for this -- it's on
Most HF users want AM and ESSB (occupied bandwidth greater than required
for
communications quality - 2.6 to 2.8 KHz) banned. Unfortunately,
certain special interest groups continue to drive the debate.
Hi.
There are also a lot of radio amateurs that are concerned about the fact
that
I am surprised to hear that people don't like the extra bandwidth in the
audio response in the K3.
For me I have been reluctant to check into a regular rag chew net until I
could have some extra low frequency response. I knew that the K3 wouldn't
measure up and I didn't want the K3 to be seen
Hi Bruce,
For communications bandwidths, a sturdy 4-ohm, 3 or 4 diameter mobile
speaker (non-powered) does a great job. For a bit more fidelity and to
take advantage of the K3's stereo speaker outputs, I use a pair of good
quality bookshelf-style speakers (again, non-powered).
Right
6 matches
Mail list logo
