Thank you all for your input. Your vote was 4 to 3 in favor.
More importantly the additional information you all provided is very
helpful.
73
Dick
AD1G
Begin forwarded message:
From: richard gilley gille...@mac.com
Date: July 28, 2009 9:09:28 PM EDT
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject:
richard gilley wrote:
Thank you all for your input. Your vote was 4 to 3 in favor.
More importantly the additional information you all provided is very
helpful.
73
Dick
AD1G
Make it 5 to 3 in favor!
If I ever get the second K2, which may happen soon, it will definitely
have a KDSP2.
I don't know how you interpret 4 to 3 Dick, but I'd call it a
'non-decision'. That's how it's been among the user comments since the KDSP2
was introduced several years ago.
For some it's great. For others it's unnecessary.
From what I can make out reading the posts over the past years, it
I might as well weigh in, too :-)
Disclaimer: I have a pecuniary interest in the KDSP2!
One nice feature of the KDSP2 is if you set the bandwidth of the K2 to
wide, and tune to an area of a band that is normally active when there
is activity at all.
The NR function then acts like a smart
4 matches
Mail list logo
