Re: [Elecraft] K3: Noise Reduction (NR) in FM Mode

2008-06-06 Thread Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy
If I remember correctly it was Collins who first came up with the idea of using a simple secondary 'noise receiver' to blank the main receiver in HF SSB mobile installations using the KWM -1 and / or KWM-2A transceivers. The secondary 'noise' receiver was tuned to a frequency above 30 MHz and

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Noise Reduction (NR) in FM Mode

2008-06-06 Thread Brian Lloyd
On Jun 5, 2008, at 8:44 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote: Aaargh! I meant to say we used high level I.F. limiters so no AM would get to the detector. That included noise. Right. If you use a discriminator there was amplitude sensitivity in the detector so limiters stages were used in the IF

[Elecraft] K3: Noise Reduction (NR) in FM Mode

2008-06-05 Thread WA6L
Yesterday I discovered by accident (or stupidity) that if you have Noise Reduction engaged and you go to FM mode, you do not receive any intelligible signals. You can tell that there is a signal, but you cannot make it out. I realize that there is no earthy reason to use NR in FM. But, if

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Noise Reduction (NR) in FM Mode

2008-06-05 Thread Bob Tellefsen
@mailman.qth.net Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 7:34 AM Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Noise Reduction (NR) in FM Mode Yesterday I discovered by accident (or stupidity) that if you have Noise Reduction engaged and you go to FM mode, you do not receive any intelligible signals. You can tell that there is a signal

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Noise Reduction (NR) in FM Mode

2008-06-05 Thread Ken Kopp
The Motorola and GE 2-way mobile radios with noise blankers were just that ... noise blankers ... that worked in the IF chain and blanked (turned off) the IF's for the duration of a noise pulse. They were primarily found in low band (30 - 50 mHz) radios and were aimed at ignition noise. The NB's

RE: [Elecraft] K3: Noise Reduction (NR) in FM Mode

2008-06-05 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
??? I worked on FM gear in the land mobile business as a service rep and salesman and we *never* used a noise blanker. A limiting I.F. amplifier was a basic part of the receiver design since the detector does not respond to amplitude modulation at all, including noise. Noise does not modulate

RE: [Elecraft] K3: Noise Reduction (NR) in FM Mode

2008-06-05 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Aaargh! I meant to say we used high level I.F. limiters so no AM would get to the detector. That included noise. So blankers were never needed. Maybe Motorola didn't use good limiters. Now to see if I can pry my foot out of my mouth... Ron AC7AC -Original Message- ??? I worked on

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Noise Reduction (NR) in FM Mode

2008-06-05 Thread Matt Zilmer
At least with the Motorola Syntor X, they used a separate and very simple receiver to pick out impulse noise and used this secondary RX detector output to poke holes in the main RX audio. They called it an Extender and I believe it was only included with the low-band Syntor X. It is described as

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Noise Reduction (NR) in FM Mode

2008-06-05 Thread Bob Tellefsen
@mailman.qth.net Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 8:12 PM Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3: Noise Reduction (NR) in FM Mode ??? I worked on FM gear in the land mobile business as a service rep and salesman and we *never* used a noise blanker. A limiting I.F. amplifier was a basic part of the receiver design