Re: [Elecraft] K3: FSK-D vs AFSK

2011-10-14 Thread Barry
Jim AB3CV wrote: Any suggestions for finding the last station worked in a pack? One of the problems with RTTY pileups, as with the other modes, is many people call endlessly. That makes it difficult, as you won't hear (or see) just one signal when it's time for the caller to xmit a report.

[Elecraft] K3: FSK-D vs AFSK

2011-10-12 Thread Jim Miller
I played a bit with FSK-D and AFSK today. I was able to get FSK-D to decode and display on the PC via the K3 Utility Terminal tab. While listening to T32C working a split RTTY pack I realized that trying to figure out which was the most recent worked station was a bit more difficult than doing it

Re: [Elecraft] K3: FSK-D vs AFSK

2011-10-12 Thread Don Wilhelm
Jim, It all depends on your software application(s). If you are using the K3 Utility display, then the only practical choice is FSK-D. If you are using MMTTY, you have your choice between AFSK and FSK. FSK will require a one transistor keying circuit, while AFSK requires connection to your

Re: [Elecraft] K3: FSK-D vs AFSK

2011-10-12 Thread iain macdonnell - N6ML
The choice between AFSK and FSK is really about how you transmit, not how you receive. With FSK, you feed an on/off signal to the K3 to shift frequency, where with AFSK you send audio tones. You can increase the receive bandwidth in FSK D mode just as you can in AFSK A mode. If you have KRX3, you

Re: [Elecraft] K3: FSK-D vs AFSK

2011-10-12 Thread W0MU Mike Fatchett
FSK is super simple to get going. No adjustments of audio etc. Let the K3 do all the work. MMAVARI allows you when using N1MM to have up to 24 decoders going at the same time. While they may say up 2-10 the decoders are probably only seeing the bandwidth of the radio which could be 6k with

Re: [Elecraft] K3: FSK-D vs AFSK

2011-10-12 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
While they may say up 2-10 the decoders are probably only seeing the bandwidth of the radio which could be 6k with the filtering etc. MMVARI will only work with audio frequencies up to 3 KHz. The 6 KHz filter (4.2 KHz max audio frequency in the K3) would be a waste. You are better served by

Re: [Elecraft] K3: FSK-D vs AFSK

2011-10-12 Thread Jim Miller
It looks like I could use my KXR3/Split and feed the LR audio from the K3 to two instances of MMTTY (or something) and then use CW memories to do the sending rather than fiddling with the transmit audio and the misc beeps from windows. Is that correct? Jim ab3cv

Re: [Elecraft] K3: FSK-D vs AFSK

2011-10-12 Thread W0MU Mike Fatchett
Yes. Exactly. The computer interface is like a memory keyer for RTTY. It is more flexible if you have a computer close by and who doesn't these days. Most logging programs even have RTTY built in so you can send directly from your logging program. I use CommCat and I know many others