Fred (FL) wrote:
After the 28 posts on "K3 PTT", I'm thinking we
haven't heard the last of this!
Wow - 45 versions and re-explanations of what the
K3 PTT function is. In just CW? As a non-contestor,
getting back into hamradio ham - I'm starting to
think the K3 is getting perhaps too complex,
Fred,
I believe it has been clarified now - many thanks to Vic and Ed. The
problem that I saw was that different folks had a different view of what
"Transmit Mode" meant when in CW mode. I would prefer the use of
"Transmit State" instead to describe a state of the hardware apart from
the ge
Not being rude, but you tried to drive an FT-2000 or worse an FT-857 where
nearly everything is on menus!
So far, this is looking like an easy ride, but with every comfort you could
imagine.
On 25/9/07 12:38, "Fred (FL)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
> Its starting to
> resemble a 747 dashboard.
-
After the 28 posts on "K3 PTT", I'm thinking we
haven't heard the last of this!
Wow - 45 versions and re-explanations of what the
K3 PTT function is. In just CW? As a non-contestor,
getting back into hamradio ham - I'm starting to
think the K3 is getting perhaps too complex, for
normal operatio
4 matches
Mail list logo
