Re: [Elecraft] KX1 v. TT R4020

2011-02-11 Thread Fred Jensen
That was a standard call protocol in the coastal marine service. Listen to KSM on Sat afternoons [in NA] on 500, 4350.5, 6474.0, 8438.3, or 12993.0 KHz. Their wheel will run V V V V V V V V V DE KSM KSM KSM [tfc list if any] QSX 500 4 6 8 12. They have a 16 MHz frequency too, can't

Re: [Elecraft] KX1 v. TT R4020

2011-02-11 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
I don't find anything Liddish about the 3x3 calling sequence when not working a pileup, working a string of stations on a particular frequency or contesting. Indeed, what I find poor practice are those who try to answer my CQ with only their call sent once. I can't tell if they are calling me, if

Re: [Elecraft] KX1 v. TT R4020

2011-02-11 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
A off-reflector comment by a PSK operator reminded me that letters are sometimes dropped in PSK and, if the operator isn't watching the waterfall, it's easy to lose the K and not realize the transmission has ended. He's seen PSE K become common on PSK as a way of adding redundancy to signal the

[Elecraft] KX1 v. TT R4020

2011-02-10 Thread eric norris
A couple of further observations: The TT R4020 is larger and heavier than the KX1.  It is almost all surface mount components, with a lot of empty space inside the case.  No mojo found lurking.  Using a 13.5v supply, it puts out a bit more power than my KX1, 7 watts on 40, 5 watts on 20 on my