om Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 6:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Newbie Question re: SSB
> Hi Bob:
>
> >I understand that Elecraft transceivers to date have really been a CW ops
> >dream, w
Hey Steve,
I didn't really baptise the K3 with SS. It was just the first serious
contest opportunity I've had time for.
And you're right - weird conditions prevailed.
matt
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:38:16 -0800, you wrote:
>Opinions are like noses. Everyone has one. So here is mine. I have
Opinions are like noses. Everyone has one. So here is mine. I have been
licensed since 1965, and have been a contester, both phone and cw, almost from
the begining. My first contest was the 1966 Novice Roundup.
Matt has some good points here. However, you may not wish to baptise a ne
Tom,
Thanks for the report. You have me salivating for my K3.
On 11/19/07 7:12 AM, "Tom Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Bob:
>
>> I understand that Elecraft transceivers to date have really been a CW ops
>> dream, which leads me to the following question re the K3: Will phone (SSB)
>
Hi Bob:
I understand that Elecraft transceivers to date have really been a CW ops
dream, which leads me to the following question re the K3: Will phone (SSB)
operators find this rig as wonderful with regard to voice as CW operators do
with CW?
Just finished operating in the SS Phone... NOT my
This may or may not answer the question, and is certainly only one
ham's opinion.
I operated both Sweepstakes - CW and Phone. Did this on purpose, to
compare the K3's operation in both regimes. Contests like this can be
intense, and Q's are difficult in the best of conditions because of
band cro
I understand that Elecraft transceivers to date have really been a CW ops
dream, which leads me to the following question re the K3: Will phone (SSB)
operators find this rig as wonderful with regard to voice as CW operators do
with CW?
Thanks
___
Elecraf
7 matches
Mail list logo
