Re: [Elecraft] OT - Heath CW Twins

2007-10-06 Thread John H Gibson
Hello David, Chuck Penson's excellent book, HEATHKIT: A GUIDE TO THE AMATEUR RADIO PRODUCTS, 2nd Ed., lists both the HR-1680 and the HX-1681. According to Chuck, the HR-1680 was released in the Fall of 1967, but the HX-1681, which initially was advertised as coming soon, was plagued with

Re: [Elecraft] OT - Heath CW Twins

2007-10-06 Thread N2EY
In a message dated 10/6/07 12:07:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: According to Chuck, the HR-1680 was released in the Fall of 1967, I think he meant fall of 1976. The first advertisement for the HR-1680 that I could find was QST for October, 1976. The ARRL Product

Re: [Elecraft] OT - Heath CW Twins

2007-10-06 Thread John H Gibson
Jim, N2EY, is correct; the 1967 is a typo on my part. Chuck Penson states that the HR-1680 was released in the Fall of 1976. Original message Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 15:54:32 EDT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT - Heath CW Twins To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL

[Elecraft] OT - Heath CW Twins

2007-10-05 Thread David Wilburn
Since there are CW and Heath enthusiasts in one place, I was curious about a set of twins I picked up 4 or 5 years ago. You are welcome to reply off lists if it is not appropriate, as I do not wish to offend. I picked up a Heathkit HR1680, and HX1681, complete with all manuals and power

RE: [Elecraft] OT - Heath CW Twins

2007-10-05 Thread Brett gazdzinski
The eham reviews are mixed. I don't think they were great rigs, but likely a lot of fun. I did a Google search, usually anything heathkit brings up loads of mods and such, but nothing on these rigs... Old stuff is fun to play with, but often not real fun to actually use, although the solid state

Re: [Elecraft] OT - Heath CW Twins

2007-10-05 Thread Stephen W. Kercel
David: In 1977 (Good Heavens! That's 30 years ago.) I built a HR-1680 and used it for several years. As a strictly CW guy, and preferring separate units, the 1680/81 combination was just what I was looking for. The HR-1680 was not a high performance receiver compared to modern rigs, but I