On 5/21/2014 4:58 AM, Charlie T, K3ICH wrote:
Yeah, that was SUPOSSED to happen, but in true guvmint fashion, it
didn't quite work out that way.
(Where have we seen THAT before?)
... and there are channels that moved their digital signals back to
their original VHF channel instead of staying on
On 5/21/2014 4:58 AM, Charlie T, K3ICH wrote:
Yeah, that was SUPOSSED to happen, but in true guvmint fashion, it
didn't quite work out that way.
(Where have we seen THAT before?)
There's still a LOT of analog low-band TV, so the chances of a 4M ham
band over here in the colonies, is just about
AM, MontyS wrote:
Joe,
I thought all the analog TV channels were de-allocated when we went all
digital.
Monty K2DLJ
-Original Message- From: Joe Subich, W4TV
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 10:27 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT 4M
In order to be of use a US
limited to very low power, (100 mW ???) so I doubt
if similar limitations would be of much use for communications
73, Charlie k3ICH
- Original Message -
From: "MontyS"
To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" ; "elecraft@mailman.qth.net"
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 6:2
Joe,
I thought all the analog TV channels were de-allocated when we went all
digital.
Monty K2DLJ
-Original Message-
From: Joe Subich, W4TV
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 10:27 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT 4M
In order to be of use a US allocation should
In order to be of use a US allocation should match that of the rest
of the world - approximately 70.0 - 70.5 MHz. Unfortunately, that
is right in the middle of US TV Channel 4 and there are quite a few
authorizations on Channel 4. See: http://www.w9wi.com/channels/4.html
Protecting the grade B
I would like to see 4M released for ham use, not necessarily for repeaters, but
rather for weak signal use. There are many times when the MUF goes above 50
MHz, but doesn’t reach 2M. 70 MHz would be very useful for sporadic E. Meteor
scatter would still be good there, not as good as 50 MHz, but
Hi Ed,
4 meters is not OT :)
We're offering the KX3-4M because of significant demand in Europe and elsewhere
in ITU region 1. We've built a couple of prototypes, which performed very well.
73,
Wayne
N6KR
On May 19, 2014, at 11:57 PM, Edward R Cole wrote:
> Regardless if the US will be gettin
Regardless if the US will be getting 4meter ham band privileges,
there are already at least two mfrs making 4m transverters so wonder
if that is a market Elecraft would be interested in entering. I have
a contract to build a L70-28 25w DEMI transverter kit for a ham in
Finland this month. He
Folks - we're drifting a bit afield from the 4M question. ;-)
73,
Eric
Moderator etc.
elecraft.com
On 5/19/2014 5:00 PM, Fred Jensen wrote:
Yes, that's the good news. 900 is also full of a whole bunch of unlicensed
Part 15 noisemakers, at least here in Northern California. There is a moderate
Yes, that's the good news. 900 is also full of a whole bunch of
unlicensed Part 15 noisemakers, at least here in Northern California.
There is a moderate amount of ham use here but it's all FM repeaters. I
doubt there's much of a market for a 900 MHz multi-mode transverter.
But then, when my
Not sure to whom your are speaking, but not awful in NorCal.
http://narcc.org will show you (wash your mouse, keyboard and hands
afterwords, quite dense in bovine fertilizer and politics).
Many of the systems are intertied (IRLP or RF) so the limited coverage
area works pretty well for channe
What's the situation on 902 MHz ? Still lots of commercial gear available.
73, Dick, W1KSZ
On 5/19/2014 4:21 PM, Ken G Kopp wrote:
As the repeater coordinator for Montana I can tell you there very few
VHF/UHF pairs available here, and none in the western half of the state.
There are many user
As the repeater coordinator for Montana I can tell you there very few
VHF/UHF pairs available here, and none in the western half of the state.
There are many users of the 70 MHZ spectrum, too.
73 - K0PP
On May 19, 2014 5:09 PM, "Rick WA6NHC" wrote:
> Another example of how mileage may vary...
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
