Re: [Elecraft] P3 adding rf protection diodes question

2014-05-20 Thread Alan Bloom
The diodes are not needed in the normal situation where the P3 is connected to the K3 IF output. You can use the P3 as a kind of poor ham's spectrum analyzer by going into the menu and setting Xcvr Sel to the last item in the list, labeled 0 Hz. Now the frequency displayed is the actual RF

[Elecraft] P3 adding rf protection diodes question

2014-05-19 Thread Sam Morgan
It was mentioned to put a couple of diodes across the P3's input to protect it. Do the diodes need to be 1n34a's or would 1n4148's be ok for that application? I had tried repeatedly to ask Don W3FPR this question off list via direct email, but I guess all my efforts have ended up in his spam

Re: [Elecraft] P3 adding rf protection diodes question

2014-05-19 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
On 2014-05-19 9:38 AM, Sam Morgan wrote: It was mentioned to put a couple of diodes across the P3's input to protect it. Don't! Back to back diodes will degrade the strong signal handling of the K3 and the receive inputs already include protection including gas discharge and a signal level

Re: [Elecraft] P3 adding rf protection diodes question

2014-05-19 Thread Harlan
Sam I would go with the 1N34a. It is a germanium diode and has a lower forward voltage drop than a silicon diodethus a lower threshold for protection. Harlan NC3C Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID Sam Morgan k5oai@gmail.com wrote: It was mentioned to put a couple of diodes

Re: [Elecraft] P3 adding rf protection diodes question

2014-05-19 Thread Sam Morgan
Joe, apples and oranges perhaps? I think you answered the question as if I was asking about the K3's input...where as I was asking about the *P3* input which had no gas discharge protection. Perhaps I should have mentioned I was speaking of using a standalone P3 for the purpose of chasing

Re: [Elecraft] P3 adding rf protection diodes question

2014-05-19 Thread Kenneth A Christiansen
Hi Joe. I think you could use the 1n148 diodes and they should be OK across the input of the Elecraft P3. The problem is from larger static voltages that could destroy the solid state devices in the P3 but with the two diodes back to back the static voltages should be held to 0.6 volts and

Re: [Elecraft] P3 adding rf protection diodes question

2014-05-19 Thread Eric Swartz WA6HHQ - Elecraft
In the lab here at Elecraft we took apart a M-F BNC 50 ohm terminator and put the back to back diodes inside. When we need to search the building for RF interference we just add it to the rear of a P3 running on batteries and use it with a collapsable whip and right angle BNC. For the

Re: [Elecraft] P3 adding rf protection diodes question

2014-05-19 Thread Fred Townsend
: elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 adding rf protection diodes question In the lab here at Elecraft we took apart a M-F BNC 50 ohm terminator and put the back to back diodes inside. When we need to search the building for RF interference we just add

Re: [Elecraft] P3 adding rf protection diodes question

2014-05-19 Thread Jim Miller
A BNC T with diodes at one female end and the whip on the other would be an easy choice. Now on my ROUNTUIT list. jim ab3cv On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Eric Swartz WA6HHQ - Elecraft e...@elecraft.com wrote: In the lab here at Elecraft we took apart a M-F BNC 50 ohm terminator and put