[Elecraft] Re:RX EQ comments

2008-12-08 Thread k4pi
Mike, I agree on the need for a separate CW and SSB equalization selection group. I have my RX EQUAL set so tight for CW it is not enjoyable listening to SSB and having to reconfigure it for SSB each time I switch I too much trouble.. 73 Mike K4PI

Re: [Elecraft] Re:RX EQ comments

2008-12-08 Thread Alexandr Kobranov
I was discussed some time ago here on the list. The best will be to have some set of profiles to choose which one to apply. There can be different needs for data, cw, ssb etc. 73! Lexa, OK1DST K3/10 #727 k4pi napsal(a): Mike, I agree on the need for a separate CW and SSB equalization

Re: [Elecraft] Re:RX EQ comments

2008-12-08 Thread d.cutter
YES Hoping this is on the list to do David G3UNA From: k4pi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2008/12/08 Mon PM 01:57:51 GMT To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Re:RX EQ comments Mike, I agree on the need for a separate CW and SSB equalization selection group. I have my RX EQUAL

Re: [Elecraft] Re:RX EQ comments

2008-12-08 Thread lyle johnson
... I have my RX EQUAL set so tight for CW it is not enjoyable... Note that the intent of Rx EQ is to provide general compensation for the audio (acoustic) response of your station, or its operator. This in general suggests gentle changes in overall response. It is not intended to provide