Don't call me Shirley
Dohn N8EWY
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Brown (HB9DRV)
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 7:59 AM
To: elecraft
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sherwood on ARRL Testing Methodology (LONG!)
I expect he wi
Good idea, I tried 2 years ago with the K2.
Stewart G3RXQ
Carefully steering clear of "Airplane" trap.
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:59:01 +0200, Simon Brown (HB9DRV) wrote:
> I expect he will be interested - with any luck he'll be at the RSGB HF
> convention, I'll ask him about this.
>
> Shirley someo
Pah! He will be there - he has a presentation on Saturday morning.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Brown (HB9DRV)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I expect he will be interested - with any luck he'll be at the RSGB HF
convention, I'll ask him about this.
I expect he will be interested - with any luck he'll be at the RSGB HF
convention, I'll ask him about this.
Shirley someone can arrange for him to get his hands on a K3.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
- Original Message -
From: "Stewart Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
When I spoke with Peter a year
When I spoke with Peter a year or so back about a possible K2 review he didn't
seem very interested. Who knows, the K3 may evoke a different response.
73
Stewart G3RXQ
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 11:55:43 +0100, Julian G4ILO wrote:
> RSGB, unlike ARRL, does not buy products for review. Review products
> a
RSGB, unlike ARRL, does not buy products for review. Review products
are loaned free of charge by dealers or manufacturers (this practise
in common with all UK magazines I am aware of - and I worked for
several years as an editor and then freelance reviewer for computer
publications.)
I think the
It will be interesting to see if the K3 gets a full spec review in RadCom.
Probably not as there is no advertising money from Disti's involved.
73
Stewart G3RXQ
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:12:50 +0100, Julian G4ILO wrote:
> That is exactly right. And it is not a fault only of ARRL. You never
> read a h
That is exactly right. And it is not a fault only of ARRL. You never
read a harsh review in RSGB RadCom or Practical Wireless over here
either. PW reviews are a total waste of time as they are completely
subjective.
--
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392 K3 s/n: ???
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Ham-Direct
Ouch - I would say he nailed it! I have serious issues with the AGC as
handled by the Orion's DSP.
What will the K3 offer?
k4ia
Craig "Buck"
Fredericksburg, Virginia USA
** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
>
> When will the day come when the information in QST is more than a
> fluff review, and a free multi-page advertisement for the manufacturer?
When the magazine publishing costs are not paid for by the advertisers?
I can't wait to compare the K3 with my 2000 and 1000MP.
Mike W0MU
Sent using th
waveBill
thanks for your input..really appreciated...
de
Wp4o, Ed
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Tippett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 7:08 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] Sherwood on ARRL Testing Methodology (LONG!)
Rob Sherwood gav
Rob Sherwood gave his permission to post this on the
FT-2000 list. Since that is public information I am posting
it here also. BTW I agree with his comments on the "new"
methodology.
73, Bill W4ZV
What has gone wrong with the ARRL's new Product Revi
12 matches
Mail list logo
