[K3] RE: [Elecraft] UTILITY Improvements

K3KO wrote: Heck no. Go with ASCII. I don't know why people want to complicate the dickens out of things. We're not talking about graphics. Simply numbers and text. KISS see your common sense quote below DE Brian/K3KO But XML is simple to use, Brian. Any decent programming

[K3] RE: [Elecraft] UTILITY Improvements

Heck no. Go with ASCII. I don't know why people want to complicate the dickens out of things. We're not talking about graphics. Simply numbers and text. KISS see your common sense quote below DE Brian/K3KO Lee Buller wrote: Why not use XML so interchange could be universal? That

RE: [K3] RE: [Elecraft] UTILITY Improvements

XML is for numbers and text. Bob Serwy - N9RS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K3KO Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 8:18 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [K3] RE: [Elecraft] UTILITY Improvements Heck no. Go with ASCII. I don't

RE: [K3] RE: [Elecraft] UTILITY Improvements

language like XML would be a better choice, sorry. Dick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K3KO Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 6:18 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [K3] RE: [Elecraft] UTILITY Improvements Heck no. Go with ASCII. I don't