One way to get a match with a too-short antenna is to use a less-good
ground! <G>

Seriously, as an antenna is shortened below 1/4 wavelength the capacitive
reactance gets very high and the radiation resistance goes very low - well
under 1 ohm. 

The T1 needs to correct both conditions: add enough inductance to bring the
system to resonance (balance out the capacitive reactance of that short
radiator) and convert the resulting resistance to 50 ohms. 

On the lower bands the T1 can run out of inductance and can't bring a short
antenna to resonance. Most antenna tuners have limited inductance for
extreme matching on the lower bands. That's why they usually are specified
for only 80 meters and up, and have limited matching capabilities even on
80. 

One way to overcome that is to add a loading coil to the antenna. That's why
mobile/portable short antennas have them. You can use a toroid core or, my
preference, make a small air-wound coil on something like a 35 mm film
container and add it in series at the antenna feed point. It's a
cut-and-paste sort of thing. When the T1 can produce a match you've got
enough inductance. 

I tried something a little different with my T1. I changed the T1's toroid
coils. I doubled all the values since I didn't care about 6-meter coverage.
That was easy. I wound a new L7. I found that a T50-2 core would fit if it
was tilted just a bit to clear the case when the unit was reassembled. Fully
wound it took 38 turns and provides about 7.5 uH; that's about twice the
inductance of the original L7. Then it was just a matter of moving all the
toroids over one space. The original L7 was put in the place for L6, the
original L6 was put in the place for L5 and so on with the little three-turn
L1 no longer used.

That improved the inductance range available for the lower bands. It still
won't load a wet noodle on 160 meters without an external inductor, but
it'll load a whole lot more in the way of short antennas on the lower bands
than it did with the original coils. 

The other place the T1, like any tuner, can run out of range is in the
ability to convert the remaining resistive part of the impedance the antenna
presents to 50 ohms for the transmitter. Few antennas in the real world show
an impedance over a few thousand ohms. Compared to 50 ohms, that's a range
of maybe 20 or 30:1 (30 times 50 = 1500 ohms). But a short antenna with an
impedance of, say. 0.5 ohm requires the tuner have a range of 50/0.5 =
100:1! That gets tough to do. 

BAD GROUND TO THE RESCUE!

The impedance is only that low if the resistance is only the radiation
resistance of the short antenna. However, two other things come into play:
the resistance of the conductors and the ground resistance. Conductor
resistance can be a couple of ohms in any case. If the radiation resistance
is 0.5 ohm and the conductor resistance (including any coils) is, say, 2
ohms, then the efficiency of the antenna is only 25%. It can't get any
better because the power is shared between making heat in the conductors and
making electromagnetic waves in space: 25% to RF and  75% to heat. (That's
why we need superconductor for really efficient short antennas.)

Even so, in most end-fed antennas there is another major element that adds
resistance, and loss, to the antenna. That's the ground resistance. It's in
series with the antenna, so it eats up power too. A 'typical' ground can
have anything from tens of ohms to several hundred ohms resistance. A
well-tuned, full-length insulated 1/4 wave 'counterpoise' is going to show
something about 35 ohms, for example. 

A typical 'drag wire' is going to be a lot higher than 35 ohms unless you're
walking through salt water. As you increase that resistance, you make the
matching job much easier for the tuner at the cost of less actual RF being
radiated. 

So if your pedestrian mobile setup won't tune on a lower band frequency, try
shortening your drag wire - just fold it back on itself a bit - and see if
that doesn't help. 

Of course, your RF output, typically in the range of a few percent at best
under these conditions, drops even more. But that's part of the wonder of it
all: just how little actual radiated RF it takes to be heard over very
surprising distances! 

Ron AC7AC



_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to