Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-28 Thread Edward R Cole
Jim, I was thinking of back in the 1950's when class-C was used with amplifiers for CW. I guess the finals were direct-keyed and not driven by a keyed stage. Its been awhile. My DX-35 used grid-block keying and ran screen-grid AM on the 6146. But then you youngsters probably don't go that

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Fausto Coletti
interdiction to conduction and vice versa. I had to work a lot but at the end I got a very clean TX. 73, Fausto IK4NMF - Original Message - From: Alan n...@sonic.net To: Fausto Coletti faustocole...@alice.it Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 5:21 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Edward R Cole
To catch up on the comments I address all that I have so far: Re: linear vs class-C is really a moot point as its easy enough to build a linear at 500-KHz. CW, JT65, FSK all do fine with class-C, of course. And its true that any modulation of a continuous carrier will impart some bandwidth.

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Jim Brown
On Mon,7/27/2015 10:43 AM, Edward R Cole wrote: CW, JT65, FSK all do fine with class-C, of course. Ed, I suggest that you drive a Class C amp with a K3 transmitting CW and look at the spectra with a P3 both at the output of the rig and at the output of the amp. Set the P3 display for 5 kHz.

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Don Wilhelm
Phil, That is correct, and the keying of that output stage was shaped in many cases. Grid-block keying was all the rage for help in shaping the keying envelope. Cathode keying was used too, but usually not with keying. You had to be careful the key did not bite from the voltage on it. 73,

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Alan
The need for linear amplifiers with CW has been known for many years. Quoting from the 1964 ARRL Handbook: When key clicks introduced by the addition of an amplifier stage are found only near the transmitter frequency, amplifier clipping is indicated. It is quite common when fixed

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Phil Wheeler
I'd have to dig out my old circuit diagrams, but it seems like when we used Class C amps back in the day (1950's and 60s) we keyed the output stage, not only the driver as with linear amps -- and we modulated the output stage in the AM days, too. 73, Phil W7OX On 7/27/15 11:42 AM, Jim Brown

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Tom Azlin W7SUA
Interesting discussion, but I'm now confused. In all the old handbooks the discussion of amplifier design says ( page 76, 1941) In amateur transmitters, and r.f. amplifier is invariably operated Class C ( see Chaptr 3). I though the final tuned circuit was simply pulsed at the RF freq and

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Alan
In the good old tube days, typically the transmitter's final amplifier was the keyed stage, or at least one of them. So the key shaping was not degraded by a subsequent amplifier. It's OK if the PA is a class C amplifier as long as the key shaping circuit takes that into account. One way to

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Don Wilhelm
Those first point contact transistors such as the CK722 were rather 'finicky'. Not much margin for error, and they were expensive. Now we can buy 2NAs for pennies. 73, Don W3FPR On 7/27/2015 8:49 PM, Alan wrote: You could abuse a spark transmitter, but the tubes would die if you

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Tom Azlin W7SUA
Hi Jim, I do have much more modern handbooks. Current in fact. :) Just remembered more Class C referenced in the older ones. Will have to go read articles back then on key clicks and distortion. And continue to look at what amplifiers I could use on the two soon to be lowest bands. 73,

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Jim Brown
On Mon,7/27/2015 4:57 PM, Tom Azlin W7SUA wrote: In all the old handbooks the discussion of amplifier design says ( page 76, 1941) In amateur transmitters, and r.f. amplifier is invariably operated Class C ( see Chaptr 3). I though the final tuned circuit was simply pulsed at the RF freq and

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Barry LaZar
Don, You are making feel old. I remember the CK722. I had one as an audio amp behind a crystal set I built using a 1N34, not sure it was even an A version. I had a 210 foot piece of wire strung from the radio, through my bedroom window to a post in the back of our yard. I could hear,

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Tom Azlin W7SUA
OK on all the thread. Ed, Yes, I am interested in following your linear amplifier project. 73, tom w7sua On 7/27/2015 10:43 AM, Edward R Cole wrote: To catch up on the comments I address all that I have so far: Re: linear vs class-C is really a moot point as its easy enough to build a linear

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Phil Wheeler
Clearly you are not among those who reminisce about the rotary spark gap, Alan :-) 73, Phil W7OX On 7/27/15 1:53 PM, Alan wrote: The need for linear amplifiers with CW has been known for many years. Quoting from the 1964 ARRL Handbook: When key clicks introduced by the addition of an

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Alan
On 07/27/2015 05:32 PM, Phil Wheeler wrote: Clearly you are not among those who reminisce about the rotary spark gap, Alan :-) By crackey them vacuum tubes are just too durn delicate for serious ham radio work. Old reliable spark is much more rugged. Quoting from The World of Ham Radio,

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Mike Morrow
Don wrote: Those first point contact transistors such as the CK722 were rather 'finicky'. Point-contact transistors could be variable in terms of electrical characteristics, but mechanically they were a lot better than mythology presents. Regardless, the famous 1953 Raytheon CK722 was *not*

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Wayne Burdick
CW also requires a highly stable ALC system, without unwanted dynamics, to preserve ideal envelope shaping. This is lacking on some all-mode rigs that pay little attention to CW. Wayne N6KR On Jul 26, 2015, at 9:32 PM, Alan n...@sonic.net wrote: CW would be another mode that would not

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Fausto Coletti
It depends on how you made the amplifier. I produce some models of amplifiers, of different powers, all in switching operation. Here an image of the DK7FC grabber, you can see at 472.1 KHz the spectrogram of a German station that use a class D amplifier, at 472.5 an Italian station that use a

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-27 Thread Vic Rosenthal 4X6GP/K2VCO
A CW amplifier can be designed to run class-C but to be keyed in such a way as to pass through the linear portion of the amplifying device's curve when a CW element is starting or ending, in order to preserve the shaping. A simple example is the tube-type amplifier that has just enough fixed

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-26 Thread Alan
On 07/26/2015 05:32 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: Soundcard sourced digital modes are really SSB signals and need a linear amplifier. The one exception might be FSK. It is constant-amplitude so a class C amplifier should be fine. FSK modes include RTTY and I believe WSPR and WSJT. Alan N1AL

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-26 Thread dave
Do we run into the FCC external amplifier 15 dB gain limit here? 73 de dave ab9ca/4 On 7/26/15 7:51 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: Don, WSPR, JT65 and JT9 are (1 of N tone) FSK modes. They are no different than conventional AFSK (1 of 2) in that the tones are continuous phase, constant

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-26 Thread Tom Azlin W7SUA
Hi Don and Alan, I was thinking one of the slow multi tone FSK modes that are a single tone at a time. WSQ is in the same class. http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/SOFT/WSQ.htm CW would be another mode that would not need a linear amp I think. On the other hand PSK31 would require a linear amp. 73,

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-26 Thread Alan
CW would be another mode that would not need a linear amp I think. No, CW requires a linear amplifier. CW is not constant-amplitude - the amplitude changes every time you open or close the key. A class-C amplifier would mess up the key shaping, causing key clicks. Any true FSK or MSK

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-26 Thread Jim Brown
Hi Tom, It's convenient to think that, but it's wrong. The problem is that neither of those signals are continuous -- both are changed to convey information. Mother nature recognizes a keyed CW waveform as a square wave modulating a carrier. Any waveform more complicated than a continuous

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-26 Thread Don Wilhelm
Tom, Soundcard sourced digital modes are really SSB signals and need a linear amplifier. 73, Don W3FPR On 7/26/2015 8:25 PM, Tom Azlin W7SUA wrote: Hi Ed. I am more interested in a non-linear class C or higher amp for those bands as was not thinking to run modes that need a linear amp.

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-26 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
Don, WSPR, JT65 and JT9 are (1 of N tone) FSK modes. They are no different than conventional AFSK (1 of 2) in that the tones are continuous phase, constant amplitude and can be amplified by a class C amplifier without generating undue IMD or clicks. I haven't seen the details of WSQ yet - if

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-26 Thread Tom Azlin W7SUA
Not if you build your own is my understanding! 73, tom w7sua On 7/26/2015 5:56 PM, dave wrote: Do we run into the FCC external amplifier 15 dB gain limit here? 73 de dave ab9ca/4 On 7/26/15 7:51 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: Don, WSPR, JT65 and JT9 are (1 of N tone) FSK modes. They are

Re: [Elecraft] K3: 630m amplifiers

2015-07-26 Thread Tom Azlin W7SUA
Hi Ed. I am more interested in a non-linear class C or higher amp for those bands as was not thinking to run modes that need a linear amp. WSPR, a WSJT mode, WSQ, and the like. 73, tom w7sua Chino Valley AZ On 7/26/2015 1:23 PM, Edward R Cole wrote: With the recent expansion of use to 630m