On 6/5/07, wayne burdick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may vary by country, Charles, but in general we'll cover exactly
the legal bands of operation, down to the nearest Hz.
Why not leave it up to the operator to know where the band edges are,
as did analogue radios of yore? Do hams really
I agree with Julian - this could be programmed by the user, maybe via some
nice CAT commands. An advantage would be restricting a remote-controlled K3
from transmitting on bands where the antenna doesn't work / causes TVI /
interferes with the beer dispenser.
Those of us outside the FCC's
Why not leave it up to the operator to know where the band edges are,
as did analogue radios of yore? Do hams really need a digital nanny to
remind them where the bands start and end? These limits only cause
frustration when the band allocations change (as did 40m a couple of
years ago here)
There's not much amateur radio activity outside the amateur radio bands (:o]
David
G3UNA
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/06/05 Tue AM 10:01:59 BST
To: Julian G4ILO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3 freqs query
Why not leave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Julian G4ILO wrote:
Do hams really need a digital nanny to
remind them where the bands start and end?
I think you'd be surprised.
In that vein, I wonder what our FCC regs say about manufacturers of Ham
equipment selling rigs that are opened up
The country of my residence, Thailand, requires all transmitters (except cel
telephones) to be registered upon importation. The Thai equiv. of FCC will
not approve a transmitter that transmitts out of the now-existing ham bands
and NOT ON SIX METERS NOR ON SIXTY METERS AT ALL. If the
On 6/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately the nannyless situation you find yourself in applies only to the
more fortunate countries.
I sympathise with your situation. I'd be more sympathetic if your
friend Charles hadn't written to me off-list calling me uninformed
John, u and others are vy fortunate to live where citizens' voices are often
heard by their governments. Wake up and know about the rest of the world.
Charles Harpole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Play games, earn tickets, get cool
On Jun 5, 2007, at 8:45 AM, John GM4SLV wrote:
Unfortunately the nannyless situation you find yourself in applies
only to the
more fortunate countries.
Snip tale of authoritarian woe
I'm presuming that HS has enough attractions to make up for its poor
treatment of amateur radio, otherwise
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, wayne burdick wrote:
Any constraints on frequency ranges will be *individually* applied to K3s
based on the country they're going to. No rules from one country will be
applied to that of another.
Dang it Wayneyou guys are just too reasonable and show too much common
I know it sounds exactly opposite to the purpose of the feature, but
will it be possible to change the frequency limits- i.e. if I want to
take my K3 on a trip to somewhere with restrictive rules?
Perhaps a special firmware download?
73, doug
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:06:21 -0400 (EDT)
On 6/5/07, Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know it sounds exactly opposite to the purpose of the feature, but
will it be possible to change the frequency limits- i.e. if I want to
take my K3 on a trip to somewhere with restrictive rules?
Perhaps a special firmware
Charles Harpole wrote:
Julian, it is better for you to know these facts prior to your
expressing an opinion that could be construed as simple minded, or just
uninformed.
Better luck next time, 73
Charles Harpole, HS0ZCW
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My Goodness, aren't we rude?
---
___
We will be providing K3's programmed for specific markets (such as
Thailand) with TX limitations when required. In the U.S. though, I
believe there are no FCC TX limits under part 97. As a matter of policy
though we do block 100w transmit in the U.S. CB band.
73, Eric WA6HHQ
Guys - This thread has now ended. :-)
Also, it is inappropriate for anyone to personally berate or hassle
others on the list. Please remember that our list guidelines strongly
state this. Polite disagreement and discussion is OK, but calling names
etc will not be allowed.
73, Eric WA6HHQ
15 matches
Mail list logo
