Re: [Elecraft] [K3] Fw: Non Amplified D104

2009-09-21 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Did you use the K3's MENU:MIC SEL option to choose high gain for the microphone input? It sounds like the element is good, but they were designed for very high impedance inputs. A very simple one-transistor amplifier would fix that and provide a better impedance match for modern rigs. Indeed,

Re: [Elecraft] [K3] Fw: Non Amplified D104

2009-09-21 Thread Paul Christensen
Did you use the K3's MENU:MIC SEL option to choose high gain for the microphone input? Good advice from Ron. After checking that, and assuming the mic is relatively old and its past quality-of-life unknown, I would consider replacing the D-104's mic element with a similar crystal element

Re: [Elecraft] [K3] Fw: Non Amplified D104

2009-09-20 Thread -.-. --.-N3TU -.-. --.-
I tried a non amplified D104 and it was not good at all. The audio was real low when the mike was at 60. It had a slight fan noise and I had no fans running. The mic was wired up right because when I put it back on my ADI radio it worked well. My ADI radio hand mic works on my K3. ADI and

Re: [Elecraft] [K3] Fw: Non Amplified D104

2009-09-20 Thread Don Wilhelm
The non-amplified D-104 microphone is a great one for frequency response *if* it is working into a very high impedance (50k to 2 megohms). Unfortunately, the input impedance of the K3 and most other modern transceivers is in the vicinityof 600 ohms, so the D-104 will sound very bad when used