Dave and all,
The answer to your assumptions depends on *your* definition of I and Q
signals, and also your ability to separate analog I/Q concepts and
digital I/Q concepts.
I believe the K3/K3S, KX3 and KX2 already qualify as SDR transceivers -
but they do the DSP signal processing inside
Okay, Dave...thanks for the comment.
I/Q technology is pretty much above my IQ. What would be done with I/Q from
a P3 beyond what the P3 does?
Dick - KA5KKT
>As I understand it, the KX3, and the P3, both contain a software defined
>receiver, so the I/Q signals are already present.
>That is
rvey and summary: Elecraft K3/K3S panadapter solutions
I/Q output from P3 is the best idea I've seen here on the reflector so far.
Thumbs up Elecraft
DL4ZBG
-Original-Nachricht-
Betreff: Re: [Elecraft] Survey and summary: Elecraft K3/K3S panadapter solutions
Datum: 2018-07-27T21:25:07+0200
As I understand it, the KX3, and the P3, both contain a software defined
receiver, so the I/Q signals are already present.
That is not the case for the receiver in the K3 or K3S, so adding it there
would involve adding a SDR.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 2:21 PM Dick Dickinson
wrote:
> Ever the
:05 PM
To: Wayne Burdick
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Survey and summary: Elecraft K3/K3S panadapter solutions
That would be perfect for my use. Im only one but sign me up.
Merv K9FD
> I/Q output from the P3 is certainly possible, and we’re considering it.
>
> Wayn
I/Q output from P3 is the best idea I've seen here on the reflector so far.
Thumbs up Elecraft
DL4ZBG
-Original-Nachricht-
Betreff: Re: [Elecraft] Survey and summary: Elecraft K3/K3S panadapter solutions
Datum: 2018-07-27T21:25:07+0200
Von: "Bob via Elecraft"
An: "J
Me too.
If this is to be a marketing survey I'll commit to it now!
73,
Bob
K2TK ex KN2TKR (1956) & K2TKR
On 7/27/2018 2:10 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
Looking forward to it!
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2018-07-27 11:51 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
I/Q output from the P3 is certainly possible,
Ever the contrarian here, I note the KX3 has I/Q output. Why not a module
for the K3/S rather than the P3..?
Dick - KA5KKT
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
Looking forward to it!
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2018-07-27 11:51 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
I/Q output from the P3 is certainly possible, and we’re considering it.
Wayne,
N6KR
http://www.elecraft.com
On Jul 26, 2018, at 9:18 PM, K9FD wrote:
My question is: Wayne as I remember
That would be perfect for my use. Im only one but sign me up.
Merv K9FD
I/Q output from the P3 is certainly possible, and we’re considering it.
Wayne,
N6KR
http://www.elecraft.com
On Jul 26, 2018, at 9:18 PM, K9FD wrote:
My question is: Wayne as I remember said the P3 was
Wayne.
In what “Time Frame” might it exist??
6 months, 12 months?? Never??
And while this question has also been raised; is there a possibility of mouse
control with a P3? This would be a real PLUS!
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On Jul 27, 2018, at 11:56 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
>
I meant to mention that that this would require a small, easily retrofitted
add-on module for the P3.
Anticipating the next question: it doesn’t exist so there isn’t a waiting list
yet :)
Wayne
http://www.elecraft.com
> On Jul 27, 2018, at 8:51 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
>
> I/Q
I/Q output from the P3 is certainly possible, and we’re considering it.
Wayne,
N6KR
http://www.elecraft.com
> On Jul 26, 2018, at 9:18 PM, K9FD wrote:
>
> My question is: Wayne as I remember said the P3 was actually a SDR, so it
> thats
> true is it not possible to have an add on
My question is: Wayne as I remember said the P3 was actually a SDR,
so it thats
true is it not possible to have an add on board for the P3 to bring out
the I/Q signal
for use with a computer and Skimmer software etc?
I never got an answer when asking this before, or am I all wet that
this
V
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 8:29 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Survey and summary: Elecraft K3/K3S panadapter
solutions
Most of the sound cards that support 192 KHz sampling (~200KHz display
with NaP3) have either lost driver support for Windows 10 or have
reported ha
...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 8:29 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Survey and summary: Elecraft K3/K3S panadapter solutions
On 2018-07-26 7:07 PM, Roger D Johnson wrote:
> It's also f
On 2018-07-26 7:07 PM, Roger D Johnson wrote:
It's also fine with a reliable sound card!
73, Roger
Most of the sound cards that support 192 KHz sampling (~200KHz display
with NaP3) have either lost driver support for Windows 10 or have
reported hardware reliability issues. That is a
It's also fine with a reliable sound card!
73, Roger
On 7/26/2018 6:33 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
The issue is that NaP3 does not support Airspy, SDRplay or RTS dongle
based SDRs. It's fine if one has LP-Pan with an unreliable sound card
or Fun Cube Dongle but otherwise it's rather
The issue is that NaP3 does not support Airspy, SDRplay or RTS dongle
based SDRs. It's fine if one has LP-Pan with an unreliable sound card
or Fun Cube Dongle but otherwise it's rather crippled and not readily
supported.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2018-07-26 5:28 PM, ab2tc wrote:
Hi,
None of
Hi,
None of you buddies have heard of LP-PAN and NaP3? No RF splitter needed and
NaP3 takes care of all the frequency offsets caused by the bandpass shifting
on the K3(S). The latest versions of NaP3 even have cluster spots displayed.
AB2TC Knut
William Liporace - WC2L wrote
> Great
Great information!! The Airspy & N1MM+ Spectrum display is pretty cool.
It is radio independent (K3, FTdx500, etc). The cost is $200. It is
dead easy! My guess the Flex guys used the software included.
So about 12% of the teams used the Airspy HF+. My guess is that you had
most of them were
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list:
"Instead I chose one of SDR-based alternatives which does more, better, at
lower cost, and - crucially - continues to evolve. Meanwhile, the P3 falls
farther behind. "
While my TS-590 panadapter solution is not directly related to K3 integration
it may be of interest to those considering how
nd.
>
> 73 from Ian GM3SEK
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-
> >boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Stefan von Baltz, DL1IAO
> >Sent: 26 July 2018 09:53
> >To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> >Subj
ntinues to evolve. Meanwhile, the P3 falls farther
behind.
73 from Ian GM3SEK
>-Original Message-
>From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-
>boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Stefan von Baltz, DL1IAO
>Sent: 26 July 2018 09:53
>To: Elecraft@mailman
I'm using the SDR Play / RSP1 with HDSDR software. With the RSP1
connected to the IF OUT I find that nothing else is required.
Configured in the software, via OmniRig for Sync to Rig and Sync from
Rig, I have full point and click mouse control. Click on a signal and
the radio goes there.
My teammate and I decided that we wanted to have a panadapter with mouse
support and point & click functionality for WRTC 2018. Unfortunately we did not
find the time to build and test alternative solutions to the P3 and
consequently decided against an Elecraft K3S as our radio. However, the
27 matches
Mail list logo
