As I recall Jim, he championed the 220, Use it or
Lose It campaign. There was a lot of commercial
interest in the band in the 70s, probably the same is
true now as well.
Folks had strong emotions, one way or the other, when
it came to Wayne.
73,
Julius
n2wn
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a
In some ways, 73 represented a different side of Ham
Radio. We do owe Wayne gratitude for keeping 220 mHz
available for ham use.
We always had access to all of the US magazines. Wish
it were easier to pick up a copy of none US radio
magazines here (then and now)
73,
Julius
n2wn
--- Brian Lloyd
If you became a member of the RSGB you would get Radcom every month :-)
73,
Geoff
GM4ESD
J F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We always had access to all of the US magazines. Wish
it were easier to pick up a copy of none US radio
magazines here (then and now)
73,
Julius
n2wn
Actually Geoff, the ARRL has a decent deal going on
for RSGB membership:
RadCom Magazine (RSGB)
-- Subscriptions are now available on an exclusive
deal from ARRL! RadCom is the UK's biggest and best
radio magazine. It is published by the Radio Society
of Great Britain (RSGB).
Enjoy 15 monthly
J F wrote:
Actually Geoff, the ARRL has a decent deal going on
for RSGB membership:
RadCom Magazine (RSGB)
-- Subscriptions are now available on an exclusive
deal from ARRL!
any comments on which one would be your pick
if you could only read one or the other?
QST or RadCom
--
GB 73's
KA5OAI
It would depend on your interests. I'd probably stick
with QST because it covers more items of interest for
me. These being ARRL sponsored contests, national
events including legislation/regulation and regional
activities. One could argue strongly for CQ magazine
for the same reasons.
If my bend
In a message dated 5/14/07 8:43:46 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We do owe Wayne gratitude for keeping 220 mHz
available for ham use.
How did he do that?
73 de Jim, N2EY
**
See what's free at
http://www.aol.com.
Hi Brian,
thanks for your message.
--- Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are right on both. I have missed HamRadio ..
it
died when it was sold to 73 ... a no technology
booklet...
Hey! I resent that! I wrote the Packet Talk column
for 73 around
1988/1989. I tried to ensure
Geoff Gian,
To play devil's advocate (I'm decent in this role), if
the H-mode mixers is as simple and as effective as you
both suggest. Why hasn't it been more widely adopted?
For the most part, I've seen a couple mixers boards
and mostly references to homebrew building, but
nothing in the way
Hi Julius,
It might have something to do with Intellectual Title, but not being well
versed in such matters I could well be wrong. I have read very recently that
the H-Mode is being used in a new receiver for military use, and I know that
Rhode Schwarz use a very similar mixer in one of
Hi Julius and Geoff and all.
Thanks again for your notes. I hope to be clear on all
of them.
I will reply to both Geoff and Julius notes and these
will match Geoff comments/questions (I hope).
--- Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Julius,
It might have something
Hi Geoff,
It seems strange to me that it lingers more on the
fringes than moving into the mainstream. If it's been
around for 15 or more years, one would think something
could have been negotiated regarding any intellectual
rights.
It certainly sounds interesting based on what I've
read. 'Twould
Hi Gian,
The H-Mode Mixer (3 transformers) using both SD5000
and FST3125, referred to the TRIAD (W7AAZ, W4ZCB and
G3SBI) is reported in the ARRL Book EMRF Design.
Perhaps I missed these, been reading more about
antennas than Rx design, particularly if it was SDR.
Mea Culpa here...
Hi Julius,
J F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems strange to me that it lingers more on the
fringes than moving into the mainstream. If it's been
around for 15 or more years, one would think something
could have been negotiated regarding any intellectual
rights.
I think that it has, but not
Hi Julius,
--- J F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gian,
The H-Mode Mixer (3 transformers) using both
SD5000
and FST3125, referred to the TRIAD (W7AAZ, W4ZCB
and
G3SBI) is reported in the ARRL Book EMRF Design.
Perhaps I missed these, been reading more about
antennas than Rx design,
On May 11, 2007, at 5:37 AM, J F wrote:
Geoff Gian,
To play devil's advocate (I'm decent in this role), if
the H-mode mixers is as simple and as effective as you
both suggest. Why hasn't it been more widely adopted?
And just to confuse things even more, what about the Tayloe mixer?
73 de
You are right on both. I have missed HamRadio .. it
died when it was sold to 73 ... a no technology
booklet...
Hey! I resent that! I wrote the Packet Talk column for 73 around
1988/1989. I tried to ensure that it had some useful technical content!
(Just kidding. No offense taken. :-)
73 de
17 matches
Mail list logo
