[Elecraft] Just thinking

2011-12-06 Thread Joseph Trombino, Jr
Howdy Gang: While surfing the Elecraft webpage I watched some of the videos about the new KX3 and got to wondering (in between drooling---grin). Could the KX3 architecture (SDR with knobs/front panel) be a precursor of things to come in the form of a full-size K4??? OK, like I said, just

Re: [Elecraft] Just thinking

2011-12-06 Thread Benson
I was under the impression that the K3 is already what you are describing. NE4W On 12/6/2011 7:50 PM, Joseph Trombino, Jr wrote: Could the KX3 architecture (SDR with knobs/front panel) be a precursor of things to come in the form of a full-size K4???

Re: [Elecraft] Just thinking

2011-12-06 Thread Joseph Trombino, Jr
Howdy Gang: Perhaps I should have made my previous comment regarding the KX3 and my daydream K4 a bit clearer. I should have been more specific in terms of the QSD (quadrature sampling detector) architecture of the KX3 as related to my day dream K4. While the K3 is controlled via firmware

Re: [Elecraft] Just thinking

2011-12-06 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
I agree, Joe. The direct conversion (RF to baseband) architecture has been around since the earliest days of radio for a reason. The superheterodyne format using intermediate frequencies offered selectivity that wasn't available in the past but at a cost: spurious responses and very sensitive gain

Re: [Elecraft] Just thinking

2011-12-06 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
But modern techniques now provide the selectivity needed without the superheterodyne format with all of its issues. The quadrature sampling detector is one of those. The quadrature sampling detector is a large step backward from the current IF sampling in the K3. I have always felt QSD as

Re: [Elecraft] Just thinking

2011-12-06 Thread lyle johnson
Superhets also allowed the considerable receive path gain needed to not be all at signal (RF) or AF. Also, the KX3, while using quadrature techniques, definitely does NOT use a sampling detector. 73, Lyle KK7P/7 (Tucson AZ) __