NLK[?] at Jim Creek used to transmit on 24.8 KHz with a megawatt or a
little more. I don't know if it is still active. The antenna is [was]
a linear series of vertical elements down a valley, suspended by cables
from the mountains on each side. I believe there were ten total, fed in
two
We had an ELF transmitter site here in the U.P. of Michigan. Some
pictures and notes about the old location are on my cabin site.
http://webpages.charter.net/aj8mh-radio/mich1.html
73,
Joe ( AJ8MH-Radio )
On 3/23/2017 6:55 PM, Mel Farrer via Elecraft wrote:
Doug,
Didn't the Navy use those
But “audio” could be shorthand for “audio frequencies” instead of “radio
frequencies”. 10 kHz is a reasonable frequency for AF. I’m quite sure that my
audio amplifiers do not amplify with compression waves.
wunder
K6WRU
Walter Underwood
CM87wj
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Mar
In the 80's using my Icom R71 receiver and a Burhans VLF converter, I copied
the Omega Navigation system operating in the 10 to 12 KHz range.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega_(navigation_system)
-
Jack WA9FVP
Sent from my home-brew I5 Core PC
--
View this message in context:
Cc: Elecraft Reflector <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S ELF 10KHz
Yup. Earlier in the thread Mike / KK5F pointed that out. He was on the RX end
of the circuit.
We monitored stations from Perth, somewhere in the UK, east
Yup. Earlier in the thread Mike / KK5F pointed that out. He was on the RX end
of the circuit.
We monitored stations from Perth, somewhere in the UK, east coast of USA, west
coast of USA, etc. etc. Must have been six or eight stations on the air. We
also monitored WWVB but I think that was
Right. What is being transmitted is an electromagnetic field, NOT a
sound field. Sound is AIR (or water) vibrating. Sound waves travel a bit
faster than a foot per msec. Sonar uses sound. The system Mike is
talking about is radio.
Radio is an electromagnetic field, which the simultaneous
;elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S ELF 10KHz
Way back in ancient times I worked at a research lab where we had a LOT of
receivers tuned to all the signals we could find below 60 kHz. I think the
lowest was 13.x. There was an 18.x and 2
Yeah, I think they’re on 18.6 kHz — unless, of course, they managed to buy a
VFO in the last 40 years!
Doug, W7KF
> On Mar 23, 2017, at 4:45 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
>
> The Jim Creek antenna facility is amazing - a series of over mile long wires
> (cables) for the radiator
] On Behalf Of Mike
Morrow
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:04 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S ELF 10KHz
I didn't understand the reference to audio either.
When I on the crew of a US ballistic missile submarine more than 40 years
ago, our main communications receivers were
Way back in ancient times I worked at a research lab where we had a LOT of
receivers tuned to all the signals we could find below 60 kHz. I think the
lowest was 13.x. There was an 18.x and 24.x etc. etc. We were only interested
in signal strengths and plotted each signal on strip chart
I didn't understand the reference to audio either.
When I on the crew of a US ballistic missile submarine more than 40 years ago,
our main communications receivers were AN/BRR-3 units whose full frequency
range was only 14 to 30 kHz. These received signals from coastal stations
operating at
Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of thelastdb
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 6:57 AM
To: Ken G Kopp; wa9fvp; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S ELF 10KHz
Wait a second, there's a big difference between a sound pressure wave
coele.com>, elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S
ELF 10KHz
Receivers THAT I AM AWARE OF begin coverage at 15 khz. Used to listen to
16 khz from GBR in England on an RAL when lived in Florida.
After all, 10 khz -is- audio.
73
K0PP
On Mar 22, 2017 22:22, "wa9fvp" <re
Receivers THAT I AM AWARE OF begin coverage at 15 khz. Used to listen to
16 khz from GBR in England on an RAL when lived in Florida.
After all, 10 khz -is- audio.
73
K0PP
On Mar 22, 2017 22:22, "wa9fvp" wrote:
> Is it possible, maybe in the next firmware rev, to extend
I would love to see this but last I asked I was told No
From: wa9fvp <rep...@willcoele.com>
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:25 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] K3S ELF 10KHz
Is it possible, maybe in the next firmware rev, to extend the bottom end of
t
+1
Christian F1GWR
Le 23 mars 2017 à 05:21, wa9fvp a écrit :
> Is it possible, maybe in the next firmware rev, to extend the bottom end of
> the K3S down to 10KHz?
>
>
>
> -
> Jack WA9FVP
>
> Sent from my home-brew I5 Core PC
> --
> View this message in context:
Is it possible, maybe in the next firmware rev, to extend the bottom end of
the K3S down to 10KHz?
-
Jack WA9FVP
Sent from my home-brew I5 Core PC
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3S-and-VLF-tp7628247p7628423.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list
18 matches
Mail list logo