I guess they'd have to avoid such as the names as
those of the seven dwarfs -- and these days even
"Grumpy, Snotty and Snort" might be problematic re
copyrights and such.
Phil W7OX
On 5/24/16 5:23 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:
It's their business, lock, stock and barrel. They could call their
Guys - we are drifting way OT. Lets end this thread at this time.
73,
Eric
/elecraft.com/
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post:
It's their business, lock, stock and barrel. They could call their models
Grumpy, Snotty and Snort if they wanted to. Ain't no laws and nuthin in the
bible about it, except maybe can't name something with a cuss word or
something on the FCC banned word list. No IEEE standards. Just so long as
the
Phil wrote:
> Interesting analysis, Mike -- though relating the various *AT* acronyms
> to rigs is a bit mind bending :-)
Don't I know it, Phil! K1AT, K2AT, K3AT, KX1AT, KX2AT, KX3AT, etc. would be
clearer and cleaner. Then, there's KAT100, KAT500, KXAT100...perhaps K2AT100,
K3AT500,
4 matches
Mail list logo
