Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Guys, let's take the dBc discussion off list. 73, Eric Mooderator /elecraft.com/ On 10/19/2016 6:35 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: On 10/19/2016 2:11 AM, Jim Brown wrote: The "carrier" reference for other modulation is the peak of the envelope. Which means your dBc references should be labelled "dB PEP" for the particular modulation. The reference to dBc is only strictly accurate for the unmodulated carrier and possibly CW. Unless you are using known modulation (e.g., 2 tone for SSB, "idle" for PSK31) there is no simple PEP to carrier reference. 73, ... Joe, W4TV __ Elecraft mailing list __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
On 10/19/2016 2:11 AM, Jim Brown wrote: The "carrier" reference for other modulation is the peak of the envelope. Which means your dBc references should be labelled "dB PEP" for the particular modulation. The reference to dBc is only strictly accurate for the unmodulated carrier and possibly CW. Unless you are using known modulation (e.g., 2 tone for SSB, "idle" for PSK31) there is no simple PEP to carrier reference. 73, ... Joe, W4TV __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Gee, I thought I did. I told you how I made the measurements. Every data point was picked off of the curves with the cursor. The SSB data is relative to the highest peak in the envelope, not to the carrier, of course, which is suppressed. The "carrier" reference for other modulation is the peak of the envelope. 73, Jim On Tue,10/18/2016 7:38 PM, Wes Stewart wrote: You didn't answer the question. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
You didn't answer the question. On 10/18/2016 4:47 PM, Jim Brown wrote: The data is accumulated peaks for 30-40 seconds. Reference for dBC is the peak of the waveform. That terminology is not appropriate, of course, for the SSB data. 73, Jim On Tue,10/18/2016 12:53 PM, Wes Stewart wrote: What method(s) did you use to verify the accuracy of your dB(c) numbers? I get a little queasy when I see "-48.5 dBc." __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
The official response I got from the factory is that to have any of the IMD mods done, the radio needs to be sent in to the factory. Bill N0CU -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3S-QST-Article-tp7623462p7623522.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Hi Gene, The K3S was definitely a random production unit. The failure was quite unusual as it was an intermittent solder connection in that particular LPF. We rarely see that in this area on our professionally assembled and inspected boards. It must have been intermittent as it passed our automated board level and final K3S tests. As a double check we tightened our visual inspection of that area of the board and reviewed our test procedures. So far no other failures like this one found. 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 10/18/2016 2:51 PM, n...@comcast.net wrote: Hi Eric, Just curious/devils advocate question. Was this unit that was reviewed, picked at random from stock at Elecraft? If so, or not, wouldn't it's performance be reflective of a population of other units manufactured? Just curious how you can say all others shipped were/are OK on 17, when the review unit was not? Just asking. Also curious, when radios are factory built and aligned, does Elecraft keep some kind of history data base of performance measurements of hose radios. kind od like a Certificate of Analysis/Performance, of specifications? Thanks and 73, Gene N9TF K3S 10057 - Original Message - From: "Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft" <e...@elecraft.com> To: "Jim Rogers" <jim.w4...@gmail.com>, "elecraft" <elecraft@mailman.qth.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 2:10:17 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article Hi Jim - The 17 m harmonic problem was limited to the single review unit, which we corrected. All others shipped were/are OK on 17M. 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 10/18/2016 11:38 AM, Jim Rogers wrote: To all who responded, certainly my friend Don and others "During initial testing, we found that the second harmonic on 17 meters measured 42 dB below the fundamental, well below the specified >50 dB we measured on the other bands. We returned the transceiver to Elecraft for repair and they brought it into spec." Bob Allison, WB1GCM Assistant ARRL Laboratory Manager, QST (Nov 2016) p.50 sidebar. Elecraft K3s Operators manual pg. 9 "Harmonic Spurious Outputs >50 dB below carrier @ 100W (>60 dB on 6 meters). Just sayin' if that is the case with my K3s s/n 10271, send me the necessary board/module(s) to correct the situation and I will be more than happy to make the replacement in my K3s and return the defective units to Elecraft for rework. Just don't ask me to send the whole radio back for something I can accomplish in the field. I am not angry, perhaps a bit dissappointed. I love my K-Line, which originated with a K3 and when the K3s came out, I elected to buy a K3s rather than upgrade my K3. Tell me my radio meets the spec and does not need repair to meet the spec and I am a happy camper. Jim, W4ATK __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to eric.swa...@elecraft.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to n...@comcast.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to eric.swa...@elecraft.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
And by the way, it *was* picked at random, in effect; we had no idea who purchased the unit, or when, until the ARRL gave us their first set of numbers. 73, Wayne N6KR On Oct 18, 2016, at 2:51 PM, n...@comcast.net wrote: > Hi Eric, > Just curious/devils advocate question. Was this unit that was reviewed, > picked at random from stock at Elecraft? If so, or not, wouldn't it's > performance be reflective of a population of other units manufactured? Just > curious how you can say all others shipped were/are OK on 17, when the review > unit was not? > > Just asking. > > Also curious, when radios are factory built and aligned, does Elecraft keep > some kind of history data base of performance measurements of hose radios. > kind od like a Certificate of Analysis/Performance, of specifications? > > Thanks and 73, Gene N9TF > K3S 10057 > > - Original Message - > > From: "Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft" <e...@elecraft.com> > To: "Jim Rogers" <jim.w4...@gmail.com>, "elecraft" <elecraft@mailman.qth.net> > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 2:10:17 PM > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article > > Hi Jim - The 17 m harmonic problem was limited to the single review unit, > which > we corrected. All others shipped were/are OK on 17M. > > 73, > > Eric > /elecraft.com/ > > On 10/18/2016 11:38 AM, Jim Rogers wrote: >> To all who responded, certainly my friend Don and others >> >> "During initial testing, we found that the second harmonic on 17 meters >> measured 42 dB below the fundamental, well below the specified >50 dB we >> measured on the other bands. We returned the transceiver to Elecraft for >> repair and they brought it into spec." Bob Allison, WB1GCM Assistant ARRL >> Laboratory Manager, QST (Nov 2016) p.50 sidebar. >> >> Elecraft K3s Operators manual pg. 9 "Harmonic Spurious Outputs >50 dB below >> carrier @ 100W (>60 dB on 6 meters). >> >> Just sayin' if that is the case with my K3s s/n 10271, send me the necessary >> board/module(s) to correct the situation and I will be more than happy to >> make >> the replacement in my K3s and return the defective units to Elecraft for >> rework. Just don't ask me to send the whole radio back for something I can >> accomplish in the field. >> >> I am not angry, perhaps a bit dissappointed. I love my K-Line, which >> originated with a K3 and when the K3s came out, I elected to buy a K3s >> rather >> than upgrade my K3. Tell me my radio meets the spec and does not need repair >> to meet the spec and I am a happy camper. >> >> Jim, W4ATK >> >> >> >> >> __ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to eric.swa...@elecraft.com >> > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to n...@comcast.net > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to n...@elecraft.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
It certainly left the factory working on 17 meters, because we do a 100% test on all bands for TX harmonic suppression. My working theory is that the unit was damaged in shipping. We may never know. 73, Wayne N6KR On Oct 18, 2016, at 2:51 PM, n...@comcast.net wrote: > Hi Eric, > Just curious/devils advocate question. Was this unit that was reviewed, > picked at random from stock at Elecraft? If so, or not, wouldn't it's > performance be reflective of a population of other units manufactured? Just > curious how you can say all others shipped were/are OK on 17, when the review > unit was not? > > Just asking. > > Also curious, when radios are factory built and aligned, does Elecraft keep > some kind of history data base of performance measurements of hose radios. > kind od like a Certificate of Analysis/Performance, of specifications? > > Thanks and 73, Gene N9TF > K3S 10057 > > - Original Message - > > From: "Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft" <e...@elecraft.com> > To: "Jim Rogers" <jim.w4...@gmail.com>, "elecraft" <elecraft@mailman.qth.net> > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 2:10:17 PM > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article > > Hi Jim - The 17 m harmonic problem was limited to the single review unit, > which > we corrected. All others shipped were/are OK on 17M. > > 73, > > Eric > /elecraft.com/ > > On 10/18/2016 11:38 AM, Jim Rogers wrote: >> To all who responded, certainly my friend Don and others >> >> "During initial testing, we found that the second harmonic on 17 meters >> measured 42 dB below the fundamental, well below the specified >50 dB we >> measured on the other bands. We returned the transceiver to Elecraft for >> repair and they brought it into spec." Bob Allison, WB1GCM Assistant ARRL >> Laboratory Manager, QST (Nov 2016) p.50 sidebar. >> >> Elecraft K3s Operators manual pg. 9 "Harmonic Spurious Outputs >50 dB below >> carrier @ 100W (>60 dB on 6 meters). >> >> Just sayin' if that is the case with my K3s s/n 10271, send me the necessary >> board/module(s) to correct the situation and I will be more than happy to >> make >> the replacement in my K3s and return the defective units to Elecraft for >> rework. Just don't ask me to send the whole radio back for something I can >> accomplish in the field. >> >> I am not angry, perhaps a bit dissappointed. I love my K-Line, which >> originated with a K3 and when the K3s came out, I elected to buy a K3s >> rather >> than upgrade my K3. Tell me my radio meets the spec and does not need repair >> to meet the spec and I am a happy camper. >> >> Jim, W4ATK >> >> >> >> >> __ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to eric.swa...@elecraft.com >> > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to n...@comcast.net > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to n...@elecraft.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
The data is accumulated peaks for 30-40 seconds. Reference for dBC is the peak of the waveform. That terminology is not appropriate, of course, for the SSB data. 73, Jim On Tue,10/18/2016 12:53 PM, Wes Stewart wrote: What method(s) did you use to verify the accuracy of your dB(c) numbers? I get a little queasy when I see "-48.5 dBc." __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
That's harmonics which the FCC regulates to -43 dBc or better, better being a bigger number, on 160-10m, and -60dBc for 6 meters and up. That number IS regulated. That is not the same as two tone TX IMD which is specified by Elecraft as around -30dB, and NOT regulated by the FCC, because most hams can't measure it accurately. On 10/18/2016 2:53 PM, Wes Stewart wrote: What method(s) did you use to verify the accuracy of your dB(c) numbers? I get a little queasy when I see "-48.5 dBc." On 10/18/2016 10:51 AM, Jim Brown wrote: On Tue,10/18/2016 3:43 AM, Yngvi (TF3Y) wrote: How fast does IMD deteriorate with increased power from the K3S or K3? What are the IMD figures when running 20-25W driving a linear amp. such as the KPA500? I've looked carefully at this, and so has my neighbor Bob Wolbert, K6XX, who is an engineer at Elecraft and a serious contester. The first link shows my measurements, the second is a pdf of the slides for a talk that K6XX gave to NCCC three years ago. It includes measured data showing how TX power out and DC voltage affect IMD. In my measurements, increased IMD causes CW bandwidth to increase. You can see that difference by comparing measurements at 30W, 50W, and 100W. http://k9yc.com/P3_Spectrum_Measurements.pdf http://k9yc.com/K6XXAmpTalk.pdf 73, Jim K9YC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to ksto...@ac0h.net -- R. Kevin Stover AC0H ARRL FISTS #11993 SKCC #215 NAQCC #3441 --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Hi Eric, Just curious/devils advocate question. Was this unit that was reviewed, picked at random from stock at Elecraft? If so, or not, wouldn't it's performance be reflective of a population of other units manufactured? Just curious how you can say all others shipped were/are OK on 17, when the review unit was not? Just asking. Also curious, when radios are factory built and aligned, does Elecraft keep some kind of history data base of performance measurements of hose radios. kind od like a Certificate of Analysis/Performance, of specifications? Thanks and 73, Gene N9TF K3S 10057 - Original Message - From: "Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft" <e...@elecraft.com> To: "Jim Rogers" <jim.w4...@gmail.com>, "elecraft" <elecraft@mailman.qth.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 2:10:17 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article Hi Jim - The 17 m harmonic problem was limited to the single review unit, which we corrected. All others shipped were/are OK on 17M. 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 10/18/2016 11:38 AM, Jim Rogers wrote: > To all who responded, certainly my friend Don and others > > "During initial testing, we found that the second harmonic on 17 meters > measured 42 dB below the fundamental, well below the specified >50 dB we > measured on the other bands. We returned the transceiver to Elecraft for > repair and they brought it into spec." Bob Allison, WB1GCM Assistant ARRL > Laboratory Manager, QST (Nov 2016) p.50 sidebar. > > Elecraft K3s Operators manual pg. 9 "Harmonic Spurious Outputs >50 dB below > carrier @ 100W (>60 dB on 6 meters). > > Just sayin' if that is the case with my K3s s/n 10271, send me the necessary > board/module(s) to correct the situation and I will be more than happy to > make > the replacement in my K3s and return the defective units to Elecraft for > rework. Just don't ask me to send the whole radio back for something I can > accomplish in the field. > > I am not angry, perhaps a bit dissappointed. I love my K-Line, which > originated with a K3 and when the K3s came out, I elected to buy a K3s rather > than upgrade my K3. Tell me my radio meets the spec and does not need repair > to meet the spec and I am a happy camper. > > Jim, W4ATK > > > > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to eric.swa...@elecraft.com > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to n...@comcast.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
What method(s) did you use to verify the accuracy of your dB(c) numbers? I get a little queasy when I see "-48.5 dBc." On 10/18/2016 10:51 AM, Jim Brown wrote: On Tue,10/18/2016 3:43 AM, Yngvi (TF3Y) wrote: How fast does IMD deteriorate with increased power from the K3S or K3? What are the IMD figures when running 20-25W driving a linear amp. such as the KPA500? I've looked carefully at this, and so has my neighbor Bob Wolbert, K6XX, who is an engineer at Elecraft and a serious contester. The first link shows my measurements, the second is a pdf of the slides for a talk that K6XX gave to NCCC three years ago. It includes measured data showing how TX power out and DC voltage affect IMD. In my measurements, increased IMD causes CW bandwidth to increase. You can see that difference by comparing measurements at 30W, 50W, and 100W. http://k9yc.com/P3_Spectrum_Measurements.pdf http://k9yc.com/K6XXAmpTalk.pdf 73, Jim K9YC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
I have received a response to my posts from Eric and understand that the 17M harmonic problem I was concerned about was limited to the test unit supplied to ARRL. I am a happy camper! Jim, W4ATK __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Many thanks for sharing this Jim. Very ambitious and informative. 73, Yngvi TF3Y On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Jim Brownwrote: > On Tue,10/18/2016 3:43 AM, Yngvi (TF3Y) wrote: > >> How fast does IMD deteriorate with increased power from the K3S or K3? >> >> What are the IMD figures when running 20-25W driving a linear amp. such as >> the KPA500? >> > > I've looked carefully at this, and so has my neighbor Bob Wolbert, K6XX, > who is an engineer at Elecraft and a serious contester. The first link > shows my measurements, the second is a pdf of the slides for a talk that > K6XX gave to NCCC three years ago. It includes measured data showing how TX > power out and DC voltage affect IMD. In my measurements, increased IMD > causes CW bandwidth to increase. You can see that difference by comparing > measurements at 30W, 50W, and 100W. > > http://k9yc.com/P3_Spectrum_Measurements.pdf > > http://k9yc.com/K6XXAmpTalk.pdf > > 73, Jim K9YC > > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to t...@tf3y.net > -- http://www.tf3y.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Hi Jim - The 17 m harmonic problem was limited to the single review unit, which we corrected. All others shipped were/are OK on 17M. 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 10/18/2016 11:38 AM, Jim Rogers wrote: To all who responded, certainly my friend Don and others "During initial testing, we found that the second harmonic on 17 meters measured 42 dB below the fundamental, well below the specified >50 dB we measured on the other bands. We returned the transceiver to Elecraft for repair and they brought it into spec." Bob Allison, WB1GCM Assistant ARRL Laboratory Manager, QST (Nov 2016) p.50 sidebar. Elecraft K3s Operators manual pg. 9 "Harmonic Spurious Outputs >50 dB below carrier @ 100W (>60 dB on 6 meters). Just sayin' if that is the case with my K3s s/n 10271, send me the necessary board/module(s) to correct the situation and I will be more than happy to make the replacement in my K3s and return the defective units to Elecraft for rework. Just don't ask me to send the whole radio back for something I can accomplish in the field. I am not angry, perhaps a bit dissappointed. I love my K-Line, which originated with a K3 and when the K3s came out, I elected to buy a K3s rather than upgrade my K3. Tell me my radio meets the spec and does not need repair to meet the spec and I am a happy camper. Jim, W4ATK __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to eric.swa...@elecraft.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
To all who responded, certainly my friend Don and others "During initial testing, we found that the second harmonic on 17 meters measured 42 dB below the fundamental, well below the specified >50 dB we measured on the other bands. We returned the transceiver to Elecraft for repair and they brought it into spec." Bob Allison, WB1GCM Assistant ARRL Laboratory Manager, QST (Nov 2016) p.50 sidebar. Elecraft K3s Operators manual pg. 9 "Harmonic Spurious Outputs >50 dB below carrier @ 100W (>60 dB on 6 meters). Just sayin' if that is the case with my K3s s/n 10271, send me the necessary board/module(s) to correct the situation and I will be more than happy to make the replacement in my K3s and return the defective units to Elecraft for rework. Just don't ask me to send the whole radio back for something I can accomplish in the field. I am not angry, perhaps a bit dissappointed. I love my K-Line, which originated with a K3 and when the K3s came out, I elected to buy a K3s rather than upgrade my K3. Tell me my radio meets the spec and does not need repair to meet the spec and I am a happy camper. Jim, W4ATK __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Like Bill, I operate with several other hams for Field Day, CQP, 7QP (7th Area QSO Party), and VHF grid trips. Field Day is a single K3 for HF and a KX3 for the VHF station. We run 1A battery/solar. CQP and 7QP are multi-transmitter, K3/P3SVGA/KPA500 and run from Honda 2000i generators. These very nice generators DO produce some noise, and need a serious common mode choke on their output if they are close to antennas. (We operate from very quiet places in the middle of nowhere). When running power, we have double stubs on the output of the KPA500s feeding antennas for 80CW and 40CW, where the harmonics land on the next higher band. There are photos of our setup from 7QP at k9yc.com/7QP.pdf 73, Jim K9YC On Tue,10/18/2016 6:04 AM, Bill Frantz wrote: Since June, my K3 went out for the California QSO Party (CQP), a special event station from Ely NV, and field day. Field day and CQP were solar powered battery. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
On Tue,10/18/2016 3:43 AM, Yngvi (TF3Y) wrote: How fast does IMD deteriorate with increased power from the K3S or K3? What are the IMD figures when running 20-25W driving a linear amp. such as the KPA500? I've looked carefully at this, and so has my neighbor Bob Wolbert, K6XX, who is an engineer at Elecraft and a serious contester. The first link shows my measurements, the second is a pdf of the slides for a talk that K6XX gave to NCCC three years ago. It includes measured data showing how TX power out and DC voltage affect IMD. In my measurements, increased IMD causes CW bandwidth to increase. You can see that difference by comparing measurements at 30W, 50W, and 100W. http://k9yc.com/P3_Spectrum_Measurements.pdf http://k9yc.com/K6XXAmpTalk.pdf 73, Jim K9YC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
We sent an earlier posting showing which serial numbers already had the new upgrades: KPA3A upgrade incorporated starting with serial number: Factory assembled: s/n 10852 Kit:s/n 10864 LPA module upgrade incorporated starting with serial number: Factory assembled: s/n 10920 Kit:s/n 10939 73, Wayne N6KR On Oct 18, 2016, at 7:52 AM, Don Wilhelmwrote: > If the serial number is 10939 or greater, the change has already been > installed. > At slightly lower serial numbers (10852 and above) it may or may not have > been installed - it depends on whether it is a kit or factory assembly and > whether it is a K3S/10 or K3S/100. > If you are in the 'questionable' serial number range, contact Elecraft > support for detailed information. > If below S/N 10852, the change has not been installed. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 10/18/2016 10:29 AM, Bob Steding wrote: >> Is this there a SN after which these upgrades are automatically included in >> all K3S's? >> > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to n...@elecraft.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
I like the size and weight of K3 also. K3 fits right underneath the seat in front of you as a carry on, and K3 is as good or better than an Orion or FT-5000 that will not fit in there, hi! What other contest radio can do this? Elecraft K2/100. Yes, you can build it with the separate receive antenna and with computer control of the radio. Of course K3 has other advantages, like diversity receive which is routine at n2cei 160m station in FL. Plus there is a second K3 for S & P of mults. This requires the K3 lock-out feature so that only one K3 is transmitting. And there is remote control. This year in CQ 160m contest I couldn't make the trip to FL so the n2cei group sent to me the other half of the remote gear and I operated my leg of n2cei M/M 160m anyway, from Idaho. Cool. 73, Will, wj9b, ID occasional multi- op at big-gun ny4a NC and 160m superstation n2cei FL CWops #1085 CWA Advisor levels II and III http://cwops.org/ On Tue, 10/18/16, Bill Frantz <fra...@pwpconsult.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2016, 7:04 AM Since June, my K3 went out for the California QSO Party (CQP), a special event station from Ely NV, and field day. Field day and CQP were solar powered battery. The Ely event ended up being battery because the generator was putting out S9 noise. The field day was QRP while CQP and Ely were at 100W. Being able to drop back to battery saved our bacon in Ely. For all these events, and in the shack, I am very glad to have a radio with the ease of use of the K3, which IMHO, is better than my KX3. On 10/17/16 at 4:47 PM, ksto...@ac0h.net (Kevin) wrote: >How many people take their K3(s) out in the >sticks...ever...save Field Day? --- Bill Frantz | Can't fix stupid, but duct | Periwinkle (408)356-8506 | tape can muffle the sound... | 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com | - Bill Liebman | Los Gatos, CA 95032 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to wlba...@bellsouth.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
If the serial number is 10939 or greater, the change has already been installed. At slightly lower serial numbers (10852 and above) it may or may not have been installed - it depends on whether it is a kit or factory assembly and whether it is a K3S/10 or K3S/100. If you are in the 'questionable' serial number range, contact Elecraft support for detailed information. If below S/N 10852, the change has not been installed. 73, Don W3FPR On 10/18/2016 10:29 AM, Bob Steding wrote: Is this there a SN after which these upgrades are automatically included in all K3S's? __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Is this there a SN after which these upgrades are automatically included in all K3S's? On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Jan Erik Holmwrote: > Wayne, > > Is there a way to do this " at home" ? Since I´m in Sweden > it might not be practical to send the radio all the way to > California for this. > > 73 Jim SM2EKM > -- > On 2016-10-17 02:25, Wayne Burdick wrote: > >> Knut, >> >> The K3S as originally shipped does not have a design flaw. Like virtually >> all 12-V-class transceivers using currently available MOSFETs, it was >> already right around -30 dBc or better, worst-case, for 3rd-order IMD. We >> simply found a way to make it better by a few dB, and we're offering to >> make this upgrade at no charge. >> >> 73, >> Wayne >> N6KR >> >> > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to steding@gmail.com > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
On 10/17/2016 8:48 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: What would be a practical way to actually introduce such a change? Lay out all the specifics involved. Let's see your critical path item by item plan. It's cheep and easy to just blurt out "they oughta go to 28 volts." Provide an *optional* 28V PA that would drop into the existing space. If heat and/or maximum gain are an issue, it does not need to be specified for 200 W output ... 150/160 is good enough. As to power supplies, Yaesu had a dual voltage switching supply for the FT-1000MP MK V for many years. A "KPA4" could certainly have its own 28V connection to avoid changes to the K3/K3S (the present design keeps 13.8V on the PA all the time). Once one has a 28V option, the K3/K3S controller can be modified to limit power from the 12V KPA3A/KPA3B to 80 watts max which should further decrease IMD by keeping the FETs out of compression. Most published power transistor/FET data sheets show a sweet spot for IMD at around 60 - 80% of the CW ratings. 73, ... Joe, W4TV __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Since June, my K3 went out for the California QSO Party (CQP), a special event station from Ely NV, and field day. Field day and CQP were solar powered battery. The Ely event ended up being battery because the generator was putting out S9 noise. The field day was QRP while CQP and Ely were at 100W. Being able to drop back to battery saved our bacon in Ely. For all these events, and in the shack, I am very glad to have a radio with the ease of use of the K3, which IMHO, is better than my KX3. On 10/17/16 at 4:47 PM, ksto...@ac0h.net (Kevin) wrote: How many people take their K3(s) out in the sticks...ever...save Field Day? --- Bill Frantz| Can't fix stupid, but duct | Periwinkle (408)356-8506 | tape can muffle the sound... | 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com | - Bill Liebman | Los Gatos, CA 95032 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
This is an interesting thread but I wonder about the practicalities... Of course we all want to emit a clean signal. In which cases might the IMD be a problem? Running full power off a battery with voltage dropping? Running almost full power to drive an older type tube amp? How fast does IMD deteriorate with increased power from the K3S or K3? What are the IMD figures when running 20-25W driving a linear amp. such as the KPA500? 73, Yngvi TF3Y On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:58 AM, David Gilbertwrote: > > 1. W4ATK seems overly indignant about a "compliance" spec he doesn't even > understand. > > 2. And while I've been a bit chagrined about it myself in the past, > anybody who doesn't understand that Elecraft's chosen business model is > centered around portable gear (which includes motor home and cabin > operations as opposed to just backpacking) hasn't been paying attention for > the last 20 years. > > Dave AB7E > > > > On 10/17/2016 4:47 PM, Kevin wrote: > >> Hmm, compliance with what? The rig meets Elecraft specs and since the FCC >> doesn't regulate TX IMD there is nothing to comply with. >> >> The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because >> everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do >> better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the >> desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the K3(s) >> is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their K3(s) out in >> the sticks...ever...save Field Day? >> >> Just because it has a carry strap doesn't mean it's a portable rig. My >> TS-520 has a beautiful leather strap. It weighs 37 pounds. Anybody know >> where I can rent a mule? >> >> >> On 10/17/2016 3:41 PM, Jim Rogers wrote: >> >>> I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be >>> somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem. >>> >>> Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with >>> specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden >>> of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be >>> in compliance, into compliance. >>> >>> I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, >>> modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you >>> the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective >>> boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of >>> disassembly and re-assembly. >>> >>> Jim, W4ATK >>> >>> K-line, K2 >>> >>> > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to t...@tf3y.net > -- http://www.tf3y.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
1. W4ATK seems overly indignant about a "compliance" spec he doesn't even understand. 2. And while I've been a bit chagrined about it myself in the past, anybody who doesn't understand that Elecraft's chosen business model is centered around portable gear (which includes motor home and cabin operations as opposed to just backpacking) hasn't been paying attention for the last 20 years. Dave AB7E On 10/17/2016 4:47 PM, Kevin wrote: Hmm, compliance with what? The rig meets Elecraft specs and since the FCC doesn't regulate TX IMD there is nothing to comply with. The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the K3(s) is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their K3(s) out in the sticks...ever...save Field Day? Just because it has a carry strap doesn't mean it's a portable rig. My TS-520 has a beautiful leather strap. It weighs 37 pounds. Anybody know where I can rent a mule? On 10/17/2016 3:41 PM, Jim Rogers wrote: I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem. Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance. I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly and re-assembly. Jim, W4ATK K-line, K2 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Thanks, Wayne. This thread has been very interesting! 73 Matt NQ6N/9 On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Wayne Burdickwrote: > Our entire product line emphasizes portability, so we'll just have to > continue the never-ending search for 12 volt mojo. (Note: the new Upgrade > is a case of this; IMD is improved when running from lower voltages.) > > Stick with Elecraft and minimize your carbon footprint! > > 73, > Wayne > N6KR > > > > On Oct 17, 2016, at 5:48 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Kevin wrote: > > > >> The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because > >> everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do > >> better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the > >> desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the > K3(s) > >> is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their K3(s) > out in > >> the sticks...ever...save Field Day? > >> > > > > Oh yeah. > > > > "Just" change the supply voltage. AND the PA. And would that much heat > > dissipation even fit in the same space? OK. Everybody ready to go out > and > > buy a 28 volt power supply for the new K3S? The range of 12 volt supplies > > is way, way broader than 28 volt. The Astron LS35M 35A@28VDC is 380 > > dollars. Oh, a built-in? Where does it go in the case? > > > > And does the K3S add an internal inverter to produce 12V for everything > > else from the 28V? > > > > Lot of expense for a small improvement that they can get with a freebee > > change to a late developing gift improvement for the cost of shipping. > > > > What would be a practical way to actually introduce such a change? Lay > out > > all the specifics involved. Let's see your critical path item by item > plan. > > It's cheep and easy to just blurt out "they oughta go to 28 volts." > > > > 73, Guy K2AV > > > > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to m...@nq6n.com > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Our entire product line emphasizes portability, so we'll just have to continue the never-ending search for 12 volt mojo. (Note: the new Upgrade is a case of this; IMD is improved when running from lower voltages.) Stick with Elecraft and minimize your carbon footprint! 73, Wayne N6KR On Oct 17, 2016, at 5:48 PM, Guy Olinger K2AVwrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Kevin wrote: > >> The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because >> everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do >> better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the >> desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the K3(s) >> is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their K3(s) out in >> the sticks...ever...save Field Day? >> > > Oh yeah. > > "Just" change the supply voltage. AND the PA. And would that much heat > dissipation even fit in the same space? OK. Everybody ready to go out and > buy a 28 volt power supply for the new K3S? The range of 12 volt supplies > is way, way broader than 28 volt. The Astron LS35M 35A@28VDC is 380 > dollars. Oh, a built-in? Where does it go in the case? > > And does the K3S add an internal inverter to produce 12V for everything > else from the 28V? > > Lot of expense for a small improvement that they can get with a freebee > change to a late developing gift improvement for the cost of shipping. > > What would be a practical way to actually introduce such a change? Lay out > all the specifics involved. Let's see your critical path item by item plan. > It's cheep and easy to just blurt out "they oughta go to 28 volts." > > 73, Guy K2AV __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Wayne, Is there a way to do this " at home" ? Since I´m in Sweden it might not be practical to send the radio all the way to California for this. 73 Jim SM2EKM -- On 2016-10-17 02:25, Wayne Burdick wrote: Knut, The K3S as originally shipped does not have a design flaw. Like virtually all 12-V-class transceivers using currently available MOSFETs, it was already right around -30 dBc or better, worst-case, for 3rd-order IMD. We simply found a way to make it better by a few dB, and we're offering to make this upgrade at no charge. 73, Wayne N6KR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Kevinwrote: > The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because > everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do > better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the > desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the K3(s) > is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their K3(s) out in > the sticks...ever...save Field Day? > Oh yeah. "Just" change the supply voltage. AND the PA. And would that much heat dissipation even fit in the same space? OK. Everybody ready to go out and buy a 28 volt power supply for the new K3S? The range of 12 volt supplies is way, way broader than 28 volt. The Astron LS35M 35A@28VDC is 380 dollars. Oh, a built-in? Where does it go in the case? And does the K3S add an internal inverter to produce 12V for everything else from the 28V? Lot of expense for a small improvement that they can get with a freebee change to a late developing gift improvement for the cost of shipping. What would be a practical way to actually introduce such a change? Lay out all the specifics involved. Let's see your critical path item by item plan. It's cheep and easy to just blurt out "they oughta go to 28 volts." 73, Guy K2AV __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Well one of the main reasons I love my K3S is because of weight (or lack of it). Due to back problems, I cant move that 40-50 pound rig to the bench to do any adjustments, repair, etc. I can take my K3S to the beach house with ease and have a nice 100 watt radio. Each of us has their own needs and wants in a radio and a 60 pound monster with 200 watts and built in power supply for 48 -60 volts, may not be one of them. Jim K4JAF -Original Message- From: Kevin Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 6:47 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article Hmm, compliance with what? The rig meets Elecraft specs and since the FCC doesn't regulate TX IMD there is nothing to comply with. The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the K3(s) is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their K3(s) out in the sticks...ever...save Field Day? Just because it has a carry strap doesn't mean it's a portable rig. My TS-520 has a beautiful leather strap. It weighs 37 pounds. Anybody know where I can rent a mule? On 10/17/2016 3:41 PM, Jim Rogers wrote: I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem. Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance. I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly and re-assembly. Jim, W4ATK K-line, K2 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to ksto...@ac0h.net -- R. Kevin Stover AC0H ARRL FISTS #11993 SKCC #215 NAQCC #3441 --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to jcox...@bellsouth.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Hmm, compliance with what? The rig meets Elecraft specs and since the FCC doesn't regulate TX IMD there is nothing to comply with. The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the K3(s) is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their K3(s) out in the sticks...ever...save Field Day? Just because it has a carry strap doesn't mean it's a portable rig. My TS-520 has a beautiful leather strap. It weighs 37 pounds. Anybody know where I can rent a mule? On 10/17/2016 3:41 PM, Jim Rogers wrote: I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem. Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance. I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly and re-assembly. Jim, W4ATK K-line, K2 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to ksto...@ac0h.net -- R. Kevin Stover AC0H ARRL FISTS #11993 SKCC #215 NAQCC #3441 --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Charlie, You hit the nail on the head. Mark Musick, WB9CIF -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Charlie T, K3ICH Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 9:04 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article Now, I may be miss-interpreting what's happening here, but I feel is that this whole thing is being taken "slightly" wrong by several people. VW purposely faked the test to meet a gov't spec. However, Elecraft sold a radio that DID meet their published specifications for transmit IMD which are typical of other competitive radios on the market. THEN, they figured out a way to make an improvement, which makes them BETTER than the typical radio for this parameter. AND, they're willing to make the mod for free IF you handle shipping. Believe me, the "big-three" would simply come out with a Mark II, or "A" model and leave it at that. And, every time I hear that they did in fact do just that, I'm that much gladder (if that's a word) I have Elecraft's in the shack. If I'm wrong, I'm sure I'll hear about. At which point I would offer a retraction. I have been known to stick my foot in my mouth on more than one occasion. 73, Charlie k3ICH -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Rogers Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 4:42 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem. Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance. I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly and re-assembly. Jim, W4ATK K-line, K2 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to pin...@erols.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to markmus...@sbcglobal.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Jim, Your new rig had nothing "defective." It was "in compliance" when you bought it. Subsequent to your buying it, that particular in-compliance specification has been improved. There is nothing for Elecraft to fix because there is nothing broken. No warranty extends to future improvements. Be thankful Elecraft is offering that improvement at no charge. 73, Kent K9ZTV > On Oct 17, 2016, at 3:41 PM, Jim Rogerswrote: > > I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat > similar to the VW diesel problem. > > Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with > specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of > time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in > compliance, into compliance. > > I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, > modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you > the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective > boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly > and re-assembly. > > Jim, W4ATK > > K-line, K2 > > > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to k9...@socket.net > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Jim, Elecraft sold you a K3S that *was* in compliance and will still be if you do nothing. See Wayne's post yesterday. They improved the Transmit IMD for the current K3S and are offering to make that change to older K3S. They are going out of their way to add the change to your K3S free of labor charge - all you have to pay for is the shipping. I think that is above and beyond the call of duty. I have not heard of another ham manufacturer that would do anything like that. 73, Don W3FPR On 10/17/2016 4:41 PM, Jim Rogers wrote: Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } Hear, Hear! Bob/AA6VB Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Monday, October 17, 2016, 4:03 PM, Charlie T, K3ICH <pin...@erols.com> wrote: Now, I may be miss-interpreting what's happening here, but I feel is that this whole thing is being taken "slightly" wrong by several people. VW purposely faked the test to meet a gov't spec. However, Elecraft sold a radio that DID meet their published specifications for transmit IMD which are typical of other competitive radios on the market. THEN, they figured out a way to make an improvement, which makes them BETTER than the typical radio for this parameter. AND, they're willing to make the mod for free IF you handle shipping. Believe me, the "big-three" would simply come out with a Mark II, or "A" model and leave it at that. And, every time I hear that they did in fact do just that, I'm that much gladder (if that's a word) I have Elecraft's in the shack. If I'm wrong, I'm sure I'll hear about. At which point I would offer a retraction. I have been known to stick my foot in my mouth on more than one occasion. 73, Charlie k3ICH -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Rogers Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 4:42 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem. Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance. I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly and re-assembly. Jim, W4ATK K-line, K2 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to pin...@erols.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to bobchor...@yahoo.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Now, I may be miss-interpreting what's happening here, but I feel is that this whole thing is being taken "slightly" wrong by several people. VW purposely faked the test to meet a gov't spec. However, Elecraft sold a radio that DID meet their published specifications for transmit IMD which are typical of other competitive radios on the market. THEN, they figured out a way to make an improvement, which makes them BETTER than the typical radio for this parameter. AND, they're willing to make the mod for free IF you handle shipping. Believe me, the "big-three" would simply come out with a Mark II, or "A" model and leave it at that. And, every time I hear that they did in fact do just that, I'm that much gladder (if that's a word) I have Elecraft's in the shack. If I'm wrong, I'm sure I'll hear about. At which point I would offer a retraction. I have been known to stick my foot in my mouth on more than one occasion. 73, Charlie k3ICH -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Rogers Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 4:42 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem. Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance. I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly and re-assembly. Jim, W4ATK K-line, K2 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to pin...@erols.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem. Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance. I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly and re-assembly. Jim, W4ATK K-line, K2 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] K3S QST Article
How about a user adjustable amplifier on set point? In my case there is a 2 watt jump when going from 12 to 13 watts and if a person wanted a smoother output in that range for an amp or whatever it would be possible. John KK9A from: Wayne Burdick n6kr Wes, This would be a simple firmware change, and it might be worth considering. But typically we see -30 dBc or better at 12 W in production with the latest revisions. 73, Wayne N6KR On Oct 15, 2016, at 7:59 AM, Wes Stewart wrote: > ….I would recommend that Elecraft change firmware to set the max power out at 10W (LP) and switch in the KPA100 above 10W, not 12. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Has the mechanism for the K3S returns been set up yet? I suppose turn-around time also needs clarification too. Not many manufacturers would do this sort of upgrade, let alone for 'free'. Thanks! 73, Jim Jim Finan AB4AC Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. Original Message From: Wayne Burdick Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 8:26 PM To: ab2tc Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article Knut, The K3S as originally shipped does not have a design flaw. Like virtually all 12-V-class transceivers using currently available MOSFETs, it was already right around -30 dBc or better, worst-case, for 3rd-order IMD. We simply found a way to make it better by a few dB, and we're offering to make this upgrade at no charge. 73, Wayne N6KR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to jimfi...@att.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Knut, The K3S as originally shipped does not have a design flaw. Like virtually all 12-V-class transceivers using currently available MOSFETs, it was already right around -30 dBc or better, worst-case, for 3rd-order IMD. We simply found a way to make it better by a few dB, and we're offering to make this upgrade at no charge. 73, Wayne N6KR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Bill, Another good solution is LiFePO4 batteries, which have a relatively flatter discharge curve than Lead-Acid, and that discharge curve is much closer to 13V for LiFePO4 than 11.5V for Lead Acid. Yes, they're more expensive to buy, but they last a lot longer. 73, Jim K9YC On Sat,10/15/2016 8:32 AM, Bill Frantz wrote: It seems to me that this solution would tie the K3S++ to mains power. Being tied to mains power would impact my club's use of K3s with batteries on events like the California QSO party. (Our location does not permit generators.) I don't know how much such a restriction would shrink the K3S market. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
The reason DC power systems in vehicles and aircraft used 28 V or less historically is that that was the highest DC voltage that could be switched mechanically without excessive arcing. (Has to do with the energy required to pull electrons out of metals, I believe.) With the solid state switching devices now available, of course, higher voltages could now be used. OT, I know, but I always thought that was interesting. 73, Scott K9MA On 10/15/2016 19:46, ab2tc wrote: Hi, Well, as I remember it there was once a push to move to 48V for automotives but that never happened (so far). I was always skeptical on the wisdom on moving to FET finals at the 12V level. Generally bipolars work better at this low voltage. FETs come come into their own at higher voltages (24-75V). In general I still think it is silly to make modern radios compatible with the old 12V car power system. For portable use there are plenty of ways to provide higher voltages. (Eventually power supplies manufacturers will make notice.) AB2TC - Knut David Gilbert wrote There was a major initiative at least 15 years ago in the automotive industry to go to 28 volt systems in order to reduce the cost and weight of the heavier wires that were needed to cope with the expanding current drain as more things in the car went electronic. Not sure what happened to that since I've been retired, but I assume ways were found to make the new electronics more energy efficient in the first place. As I remember, one of the issues holding back 28 volt systems was the higher breakdown voltages that would be needed for the various semiconductors involved ... not everything gets more efficient or cost effective as voltages go up. 73, Dave AB7E On 10/15/2016 12:49 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote: And therein lies the reason for using 12V. It would have been easier had we gone from 6V automotive power to 28V as is used on many aircraft so manufacturers were encouraged to build generators and equipment for that voltage, but that didn't happen. 73, Ron AC7AC __ -- Scott K9MA k...@sdellington.us __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Hi, Well, as I remember it there was once a push to move to 48V for automotives but that never happened (so far). I was always skeptical on the wisdom on moving to FET finals at the 12V level. Generally bipolars work better at this low voltage. FETs come come into their own at higher voltages (24-75V). In general I still think it is silly to make modern radios compatible with the old 12V car power system. For portable use there are plenty of ways to provide higher voltages. (Eventually power supplies manufacturers will make notice.) AB2TC - Knut David Gilbert wrote > There was a major initiative at least 15 years ago in the automotive > industry to go to 28 volt systems in order to reduce the cost and weight > of the heavier wires that were needed to cope with the expanding current > drain as more things in the car went electronic. Not sure what happened > to that since I've been retired, but I assume ways were found to make > the new electronics more energy efficient in the first place. As I > remember, one of the issues holding back 28 volt systems was the higher > breakdown voltages that would be needed for the various semiconductors > involved ... not everything gets more efficient or cost effective as > voltages go up. > > 73, > Dave AB7E > > > On 10/15/2016 12:49 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote: >> And therein lies the reason for using 12V. It would have been easier had >> we >> gone from 6V automotive power to 28V as is used on many aircraft so >> manufacturers were encouraged to build generators and equipment for that >> voltage, but that didn't happen. >> >> 73, Ron AC7AC > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto: > Elecraft@.qth > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to > lists+1215531472858-365791@.nabble -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3S-QST-Article-tp7623295p7623405.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Wayne, For those of us with the unmodified KLPA3A (10 W module), can the mods be done by a skilled engr/tech. If so, can the parts be made available as a kit. If not, can just the module be sent in for modification instead of the whole radio. Bill N0CU -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3S-QST-Article-tp7623295p7623403.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Quote: "Unless things have changed they test at one frequency and assume the other bands produce the same results. " Hi, I don't believe this is true. The ARRL publishes a "typical" IMD figure and a "worst case" figure which I assume to be the worst case for any band and they they publish which band this is (12m for the recent K3S review). Anyway, this doesn't change the fact that about 600 K3S purchasers are faced with the prospect of having to face the cost and inconvenience of having to return their rigs (I am one of them) to fix this apparent design flaw. Not to do so would be unethical (to transmit with excessive IMD). AB2TC - Knut Kevin wrote > Yaesu's secret was the ARRL. Unless things have changed they test at one > frequency and assume the other bands produce the same results. > > I'll reverse the question, what has Yaesu done to rigs since 1991 that > they can't reproduce those numbers? > -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3S-QST-Article-tp7623295p7623402.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
There was a major initiative at least 15 years ago in the automotive industry to go to 28 volt systems in order to reduce the cost and weight of the heavier wires that were needed to cope with the expanding current drain as more things in the car went electronic. Not sure what happened to that since I've been retired, but I assume ways were found to make the new electronics more energy efficient in the first place. As I remember, one of the issues holding back 28 volt systems was the higher breakdown voltages that would be needed for the various semiconductors involved ... not everything gets more efficient or cost effective as voltages go up. 73, Dave AB7E On 10/15/2016 12:49 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote: And therein lies the reason for using 12V. It would have been easier had we gone from 6V automotive power to 28V as is used on many aircraft so manufacturers were encouraged to build generators and equipment for that voltage, but that didn't happen. 73, Ron AC7AC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
And therein lies the reason for using 12V. It would have been easier had we gone from 6V automotive power to 28V as is used on many aircraft so manufacturers were encouraged to build generators and equipment for that voltage, but that didn't happen. 73, Ron AC7AC -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bill Frantz Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2016 8:33 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article It seems to me that this solution would tie the K3S++ to mains power. Being tied to mains power would impact my club's use of K3s with batteries on events like the California QSO party. (Our location does not permit generators.) I don't know how much such a restriction would shrink the K3S market. A voltage booster could be a solution. Such a device would have to be well shielded and bypassed to avoid RFI. It could either be internal to the radio or a "bump on the power cable". Such devices are available in the market and seem to work well. 73 Bill AE6JV On 10/14/16 at 5:14 PM, ksto...@ac0h.net (Kevin) wrote: >The cause for this is the use of 12V finals. It would be much improved by moving to 24 or 50V finals. > >Move the /K3s II/ to 50V finals, say a pair of MRF 150's, limited to >150 or 200W max output. Design/Sell an outboard 50V switching supply >capable of 15-20A continuous current, with a 10A 12V switcher built in >for the rest of the radio. --- Bill Frantz| Concurrency is hard. 12 out | Periwinkle (408)356-8506 | 10 programmers get it wrong. | 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com |- Jeff Frantz | Los Gatos, CA 95032 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to r...@cobi.biz __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Wayne, Ok, I'll defer to your numbers. Offhand I don't have mine handy, but I was pretty amazed at how quickly the IMD rose above 10W. I'm not saying anything new here, back in December in this thread http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Powering-a-K3s-from-a-battery-tt7611959.html#a7611980, I said among other things: "All I'm saying is that if you run the LPA at 10-12 watts, according to my measurements*, the IMD is pretty bad. If you have an HPA, then after it's kicked in, (13W in my K3S) the LPA is running at greatly reduced power. I don't believe Elecraft has to change anything. Guys with a KPA3(A) just need to avoid the grey area of 10-15W. *Remarkably, IMD measurements I made on my K3S using modest equipment correlated within 1dB or less to measurements made by Elecraft, on the same radio. " Wes On 10/15/2016 8:07 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote: Wes, This would be a simple firmware change, and it might be worth considering. But typically we see -30 dBc or better at 12 W in production with the latest revisions. 73, Wayne N6KR On Oct 15, 2016, at 7:59 AM, Wes Stewartwrote: ….I would recommend that Elecraft change firmware to set the max power out at 10W (LP) and switch in the KPA100 above 10W, not 12. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to wes_n...@triconet.org __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
It seems to me that this solution would tie the K3S++ to mains power. Being tied to mains power would impact my club's use of K3s with batteries on events like the California QSO party. (Our location does not permit generators.) I don't know how much such a restriction would shrink the K3S market. A voltage booster could be a solution. Such a device would have to be well shielded and bypassed to avoid RFI. It could either be internal to the radio or a "bump on the power cable". Such devices are available in the market and seem to work well. 73 Bill AE6JV On 10/14/16 at 5:14 PM, ksto...@ac0h.net (Kevin) wrote: The cause for this is the use of 12V finals. It would be much improved by moving to 24 or 50V finals. Move the /K3s II/ to 50V finals, say a pair of MRF 150's, limited to 150 or 200W max output. Design/Sell an outboard 50V switching supply capable of 15-20A continuous current, with a 10A 12V switcher built in for the rest of the radio. --- Bill Frantz| Concurrency is hard. 12 out | Periwinkle (408)356-8506 | 10 programmers get it wrong. | 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com |- Jeff Frantz | Los Gatos, CA 95032 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
No doubt in 1991 they were using bipolar transistors, which in some cases could hit a "magic" combination that resulted in better than average performance. These days everyone uses MOSFETs, which are consistently in the -30 dBc range on at least one band. The K3S with the latest updates averages about -35 dBc at 100 W (see ARRL review). Wayne N6KR On Oct 15, 2016, at 8:05 AM, Kevin <ksto...@ac0h.net> wrote: > Yaesu's secret was the ARRL. Unless things have changed they test at one > frequency and assume the other bands produce the same results. > > I'll reverse the question, what has Yaesu done to rigs since 1991 that they > can't reproduce those numbers? > > > On 10/14/2016 10:03 PM, Dave Hachadorian wrote: >> Yaesu FT-990, 12V finals >> 3rd order TX IMD -38dB >> ARRL Review 11/91 >> >> ARRL heaped glowing praise upon this rig way back in 1991 for its >> Tx IMD performance. So, what was Yaesu's secret, and why haven't >> manufacturers figured it out and capitalized on it ever since? >> >> Dave Hachadorian, K6LL >> Yuma, Arizona >> >> >> -Original Message----- From: Kevin >> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 5:14 PM >> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article >> >> The cause for this is the use of 12V finals. It would be much >> improved >> by moving to 24 or 50V finals. >> >> Move the /K3s II/ to 50V finals, say a pair of MRF 150's, limited >> to 150 >> or 200W max output. Design/Sell an outboard 50V switching supply >> capable >> of 15-20A continuous current, with a 10A 12V switcher built in >> for the >> rest of the radio. >> >> >> On 10/14/2016 1:33 PM, Bill Leonard N0CU wrote: >>> I would not expect the synthesizer (old or new) to be a >>> contributor the IMD >>> issue. Hopefully someone will correct me if that is a bad >>> assumption. To me, >>> the primary issue appears to be the linearity of the two RF >>> power >>> amplifiers. >>> >>> >> > > -- > R. Kevin Stover > AC0H > ARRL > FISTS #11993 > SKCC #215 > NAQCC #3441 > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to n...@elecraft.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Wes, This would be a simple firmware change, and it might be worth considering. But typically we see -30 dBc or better at 12 W in production with the latest revisions. 73, Wayne N6KR On Oct 15, 2016, at 7:59 AM, Wes Stewartwrote: > ….I would recommend that Elecraft change firmware to set the max power out at > 10W (LP) and switch in the KPA100 above 10W, not 12. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Yaesu's secret was the ARRL. Unless things have changed they test at one frequency and assume the other bands produce the same results. I'll reverse the question, what has Yaesu done to rigs since 1991 that they can't reproduce those numbers? On 10/14/2016 10:03 PM, Dave Hachadorian wrote: Yaesu FT-990, 12V finals 3rd order TX IMD -38dB ARRL Review 11/91 ARRL heaped glowing praise upon this rig way back in 1991 for its Tx IMD performance. So, what was Yaesu's secret, and why haven't manufacturers figured it out and capitalized on it ever since? Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, Arizona -Original Message- From: Kevin Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 5:14 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article The cause for this is the use of 12V finals. It would be much improved by moving to 24 or 50V finals. Move the /K3s II/ to 50V finals, say a pair of MRF 150's, limited to 150 or 200W max output. Design/Sell an outboard 50V switching supply capable of 15-20A continuous current, with a 10A 12V switcher built in for the rest of the radio. On 10/14/2016 1:33 PM, Bill Leonard N0CU wrote: I would not expect the synthesizer (old or new) to be a contributor the IMD issue. Hopefully someone will correct me if that is a bad assumption. To me, the primary issue appears to be the linearity of the two RF power amplifiers. -- R. Kevin Stover AC0H ARRL FISTS #11993 SKCC #215 NAQCC #3441 --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
My experience suggests that running the low power amp in a K3(S) above 10W is a disaster. In a K3(S)/100 the HPA isn't activated until above 12W. IMHO, again based only on my measurements of my K3 and my K3S (before mods), I would recommend that Elecraft change firmware to set the max power out at 10W (LP) and switch in the KPA100 above 10W, not 12. On 10/14/2016 9:17 PM, Edward R Cole wrote: OK. I purchased the K3/10 in 2010 which is able to output up to 12w. Is the low power amp any better at IMD, or subject to the same limitations because its 12v transistors? I bought the KXPA-100 last year. Would it be any better than the KPA3 or KPA3A? 3rd-order IMD in the vicinity of -30 dBc is about what I have read for specs my many 12v power devices. I bought the new synth because I understood it would improve Rx performance (haven't installed them yet main & sub Rx). Also for K3 use at 630m. Would running the K3/10 at 5w driving a linear amp be lower in IMD? The amp uses 50v devices and made for TV which has greater linearity specs than SSB. I am also running it at about 60% full output on 6m. 73, Ed - KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com "Kits made by KL7UW" Dubus Mag business: dubus...@gmail.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
The improvements we made this year (referenced in my previous posting) bring up both worst-case and average performance of the K3S on all bands, at all power levels. Regarding the Yaesu radio that hit -38 dBc worst-case using the same PA topology: luck of the draw. There are many factors, including things as esoteric as the quality of the ferrite in the output transformers. We've measured similar rigs from all major manufacturers that were right around -30. In addition, many radios will not hit 100 W on all bands, even at 14 V. 73, Wayne N6KR On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:30 PM, Wes Stewartwrote: > Without too much elaboration let's just say that I discovered this problem > long before ARRL did. (S/N 10020) > > I can tell you that my measurements show that IMD varies with Vcc (Vdd), > drive level, power output and frequency…. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Without too much elaboration let's just say that I discovered this problem long before ARRL did. (S/N 10020) I can tell you that my measurements show that IMD varies with Vcc (Vdd), drive level, power output and frequency. This latter parameter is, as best as I can determine, inexplicable by anyone, including the manufacturers of the transistors. Initially, I compared my shiny new K3S to my tired old, unmodified K3. At the original test frequency, 3.8 MHz the K3 had much lower IMD that the K3S under otherwise the same test conditions. Moving up to 14 MHz the situation reversed. Each of these radios had a different "sweet spot," neither of which was representative of the general case. If a testing entity happens to test at only one frequency and reports the results as typical then you get a false sense of the general performance. Wes, N7WS On 10/14/2016 8:03 PM, Dave Hachadorian wrote: Yaesu FT-990, 12V finals 3rd order TX IMD -38dB ARRL Review 11/91 ARRL heaped glowing praise upon this rig way back in 1991 for its Tx IMD performance. So, what was Yaesu's secret, and why haven't manufacturers figured it out and capitalized on it ever since? Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, Arizona -Original Message- From: Kevin Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 5:14 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article The cause for this is the use of 12V finals. It would be much improved by moving to 24 or 50V finals. Move the /K3s II/ to 50V finals, say a pair of MRF 150's, limited to 150 or 200W max output. Design/Sell an outboard 50V switching supply capable of 15-20A continuous current, with a 10A 12V switcher built in for the rest of the radio. On 10/14/2016 1:33 PM, Bill Leonard N0CU wrote: I would not expect the synthesizer (old or new) to be a contributor the IMD issue. Hopefully someone will correct me if that is a bad assumption. To me, the primary issue appears to be the linearity of the two RF power amplifiers. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
OK. I purchased the K3/10 in 2010 which is able to output up to 12w. Is the low power amp any better at IMD, or subject to the same limitations because its 12v transistors? I bought the KXPA-100 last year. Would it be any better than the KPA3 or KPA3A? 3rd-order IMD in the vicinity of -30 dBc is about what I have read for specs my many 12v power devices. I bought the new synth because I understood it would improve Rx performance (haven't installed them yet main & sub Rx). Also for K3 use at 630m. Would running the K3/10 at 5w driving a linear amp be lower in IMD? The amp uses 50v devices and made for TV which has greater linearity specs than SSB. I am also running it at about 60% full output on 6m. 73, Ed - KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com "Kits made by KL7UW" Dubus Mag business: dubus...@gmail.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Yaesu FT-990, 12V finals 3rd order TX IMD -38dB ARRL Review 11/91 ARRL heaped glowing praise upon this rig way back in 1991 for its Tx IMD performance. So, what was Yaesu's secret, and why haven't manufacturers figured it out and capitalized on it ever since? Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, Arizona -Original Message- From: Kevin Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 5:14 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article The cause for this is the use of 12V finals. It would be much improved by moving to 24 or 50V finals. Move the /K3s II/ to 50V finals, say a pair of MRF 150's, limited to 150 or 200W max output. Design/Sell an outboard 50V switching supply capable of 15-20A continuous current, with a 10A 12V switcher built in for the rest of the radio. On 10/14/2016 1:33 PM, Bill Leonard N0CU wrote: I would not expect the synthesizer (old or new) to be a contributor the IMD issue. Hopefully someone will correct me if that is a bad assumption. To me, the primary issue appears to be the linearity of the two RF power amplifiers. -- R. Kevin Stover AC0H ARRL FISTS #11993 SKCC #215 NAQCC #3441 --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to k6ll.d...@gmail.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Or, we could all run 32S-3 transmitters and listen on our whiz/bang SDR. So far, they're about the cleanest 100 watt transmitter reasonably available. 73, Charlie k3ICH -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:14 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article The cause for this is the use of 12V finals. It would be much improved by moving to 24 or 50V finals. Move the /K3s II/ to 50V finals, say a pair of MRF 150's, limited to 150 or 200W max output. Design/Sell an outboard 50V switching supply capable of 15-20A continuous current, with a 10A 12V switcher built in for the rest of the radio. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
The cause for this is the use of 12V finals. It would be much improved by moving to 24 or 50V finals. Move the /K3s II/ to 50V finals, say a pair of MRF 150's, limited to 150 or 200W max output. Design/Sell an outboard 50V switching supply capable of 15-20A continuous current, with a 10A 12V switcher built in for the rest of the radio. On 10/14/2016 1:33 PM, Bill Leonard N0CU wrote: I would not expect the synthesizer (old or new) to be a contributor the IMD issue. Hopefully someone will correct me if that is a bad assumption. To me, the primary issue appears to be the linearity of the two RF power amplifiers. -- R. Kevin Stover AC0H ARRL FISTS #11993 SKCC #215 NAQCC #3441 --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
> Based upon your experience and understanding of the issue, would an original > K3 (not K3s) with the new synths have better TX IMD? In other words, is the > poor TX IMD of the K3s a function of some part of the rig not associated with > the new synths? > > Dave AB7E Hi all, This has nothing to do with the new synthesizer. Normally, the K3S (or K3) has worst-case TX 3rd-order IMD in the vicinity of -30 dBc (ARRL method) at rated power (10 W/100 W +/- 1 dB on most bands; see specs for exceptions). Nearly all other 12-V-capable transceivers are in this same range, because they all use approximately the same circuitry and PA devices. We have made changes in K3S production that improve average IMD performance at both low and high power levels by as much as 3 dB. We will make these changes free of charge on any K3S returned to the factory for this purpose, whether or not it is still in the warranty period. The only charge would be for return shipping. The changes were phased in at the following serial numbers: KPA3A (100 W PA option):Factory assembled, #10852Kit, #10864 LPA (10 W module): Factory assembled, #10920Kit, #10939 Please email k3supp...@elecraft.com if you have any further questions. 73, Wayne N6KR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
I would not expect the synthesizer (old or new) to be a contributor the IMD issue. Hopefully someone will correct me if that is a bad assumption. To me, the primary issue appears to be the linearity of the two RF power amplifiers. During the course of my troubleshooting, I noticed that a number of changes were made to the original KLPA3 in the process of getting to the new KLPA3A design. I would be interested in knowing how the IMD performance of the original design compares to the new KLPA3A design. Bill N0CU -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3S-QST-Article-tp7623295p7623363.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Hi all, I, too. prefer the paper copy, but the mention of a K3S review got me too intrigued, so I had to read it online. As for the other comments in this thread, I find this situation more than a little worrisome and certainly an official Elecraft response is hoped for. Are the updates being tested by the ARRL and published as their final findings in their performance tables even into production yet? AB2TC - Knut Wes Stewart-2 wrote > Hi Knut, > > Yes, I get a notification about the digital issue, but I prefer to read > the > paper copy, so I wait. It did come yesterday so I've seen it now. > > Wes > -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3S-QST-Article-tp7623295p7623362.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Based upon your experience and understanding of the issue, would an original K3 (not K3s) with the new synths have better TX IMD? In other words, is the poor TX IMD of the K3s a function of some part of the rig not associated with the new synths? Dave AB7E On 10/14/2016 9:06 AM, Bill Leonard N0CU wrote: I was not surprised to see a comment about the Tx IMDs in the QST article. One of the first problems I encountered with my new K3s/10 was poor Tx IMD performance. What I observed was flat topping that started at about 5W, and progressively got worse as the power was increased. The distortion was so bad at 10W, the envelope looked more like a squarewave than a two tone signal, and the 3rd order products were down only -18 dBc. After several months of working with Wayne, Rene, and the designer of the KLPA3A amplifier, replacing the KLPA3A three times, and sending the radio to the factory, the problem was reduced, but I still don't see better than -28 dBc at 10W out. Not wanting to send the radio in to the factory a second time, I decided to just live with the performance. The transmit signal generation in the K3s is a complex process based around the internal computer. Signal quality is affected by ALC, transmit power level, configuration settings, and the transmit power CAL, however, from all of the testing that I did, the signal going into the KLPA3A was very clean (-40 dBc). It is also important to note that Elecraft's approach to distortion management includes spreading the energy in the distortion out spectrally by the use of pre-distortion. This results in 5th, 7th, 9th,... order products being higher compared to some radios, as noted in the QST article. The QST article indicated that both the KLPA3A and the KPA3A have been modified to address the Tx IMD problem. I am hopeful that at some point Elecraft will offer some info/options that will allow us to bring the unmodified radios up to the performance shown in the QST article Bill N0CU -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3S-QST-Article-tp7623295p7623355.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to xda...@cis-broadband.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
I was not surprised to see a comment about the Tx IMDs in the QST article. One of the first problems I encountered with my new K3s/10 was poor Tx IMD performance. What I observed was flat topping that started at about 5W, and progressively got worse as the power was increased. The distortion was so bad at 10W, the envelope looked more like a squarewave than a two tone signal, and the 3rd order products were down only -18 dBc. After several months of working with Wayne, Rene, and the designer of the KLPA3A amplifier, replacing the KLPA3A three times, and sending the radio to the factory, the problem was reduced, but I still don't see better than -28 dBc at 10W out. Not wanting to send the radio in to the factory a second time, I decided to just live with the performance. The transmit signal generation in the K3s is a complex process based around the internal computer. Signal quality is affected by ALC, transmit power level, configuration settings, and the transmit power CAL, however, from all of the testing that I did, the signal going into the KLPA3A was very clean (-40 dBc). It is also important to note that Elecraft's approach to distortion management includes spreading the energy in the distortion out spectrally by the use of pre-distortion. This results in 5th, 7th, 9th,... order products being higher compared to some radios, as noted in the QST article. The QST article indicated that both the KLPA3A and the KPA3A have been modified to address the Tx IMD problem. I am hopeful that at some point Elecraft will offer some info/options that will allow us to bring the unmodified radios up to the performance shown in the QST article Bill N0CU -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3S-QST-Article-tp7623295p7623355.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Hi Knut, Yes, I get a notification about the digital issue, but I prefer to read the paper copy, so I wait. It did come yesterday so I've seen it now. Wes On 10/13/2016 5:35 PM, ab2tc wrote: Hi Wes, You can read it online. I received an Email link from ARRL to my online copy. AB2TC - Knut __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Hi Wes, You can read it online. I received an Email link from ARRL to my online copy. AB2TC - Knut Wes Stewart-2 wrote > I have not seen my QST yet. I think the mailman reads it first. But you > ask an > excellent question. > > On 10/13/2016 2:25 PM, ab2tc wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Very good review - for the most part. > -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3S-QST-Article-tp7623295p7623334.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Good question that I would like to know the answer to. Leroy AB7CE -Original Message- From: ab2tc Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 3:25 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article Hi, Very good review - for the most part. I am concerned about the transmit IMD results mentioned only in a side bar "Lab Notes: ..." on page 50. Initially the transmit IMD in the original review sample was less than stellar, but eventually got resolved by Elecraft submitting a new review sample with KPA3A rev C4 and KLPA3 rev B installed. How can I tell if my relatively new K3S ser# 10480 has the new modules installed? If they aren't, is this a warranty repair? AB2TC - Knut -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3S-QST-Article-tp7623295p7623325.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to lmar...@mt.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
I have not seen my QST yet. I think the mailman reads it first. But you ask an excellent question. On 10/13/2016 2:25 PM, ab2tc wrote: Hi, Very good review - for the most part. I am concerned about the transmit IMD results mentioned only in a side bar "Lab Notes: ..." on page 50. Initially the transmit IMD in the original review sample was less than stellar, but eventually got resolved by Elecraft submitting a new review sample with KPA3A rev C4 and KLPA3 rev B installed. How can I tell if my relatively new K3S ser# 10480 has the new modules installed? If they aren't, is this a warranty repair? AB2TC - Knut __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Hi, Very good review - for the most part. I am concerned about the transmit IMD results mentioned only in a side bar "Lab Notes: ..." on page 50. Initially the transmit IMD in the original review sample was less than stellar, but eventually got resolved by Elecraft submitting a new review sample with KPA3A rev C4 and KLPA3 rev B installed. How can I tell if my relatively new K3S ser# 10480 has the new modules installed? If they aren't, is this a warranty repair? AB2TC - Knut -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3S-QST-Article-tp7623295p7623325.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Thank you for noticing :) 73, Wayne N6KR On Oct 12, 2016, at 8:41 PM, "Dauer, Edward"wrote: > The November issue of QST arrived in the mail today. Nice article about the > K3S, in case anyone hasn’t yet seen it. > > Ted, KN1CBR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] K3S QST Article
The November issue of QST arrived in the mail today. Nice article about the K3S, in case anyone hasn’t yet seen it. Ted, KN1CBR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com