I think what Ron and I were shooting for was not a really fast AGC but more
of a Not-so-gosh-darned slow AGC.
Wayne...doesn't 9 to 15 seconds for the S-meter to drop seems excessively
long to you? Especially for a QSK rig.
When I changed C31 from 2.2 to .22 the hang time seemed to approximate that
of the slow AGC setting of the K2.
The pop exists on strong signals with both the stock and the modified K1 but
did not seem any worse after the mod.
Is there ANY chance that a decimal point was moved between the design specs
and production runs so that C31 is supposed to be a .22 instead of a 2.2
ufd?
Those of use who see 9 seconds or more for the sensitivity to recover really
like the 1 to 3 second recovery time after the cap values are changed.
That's one great thing about Elecraft kits...you can make them perform just
as badly as personal preference merits.
I love my K1. And if I hadn't of changed the AGC time constant I would
still love it. I just love it a litte bit more now. 8-)
Tom K2TA
- Original Message -
From: wayne burdick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Elecraft Reflector Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Cc: Ralph Tyrrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tom Althoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: K1 AGC time constant [and how to radically improve K1 AGC]
As the principle designer of the K1, I just love these AGC circuitry
discussions, and thought I'd better put in my 2.5 cents.
The K1's present AGC circuit, being AF-derived, is a compromise between
attack time and recovery time. This topic has been the subject of
scholarly efforts by Haward, DeMaw, and others, so I'll just summarize
by saying that the slow rise time of an AF-derived signal limits how
quickly you can respond to a large signal using a simple diode
detector. Nearly all low-cost QRP transceivers that have AGC at all use
this technique, including all of the ones I've designed (KX1, Sierra,
NC40, SST).
DSP can be used to emulate a faster response using various techniques,
including post-processing of the signal as it propagates through the
DSP's pipeline. But assuming one wants faster AGC without having to
write DSP code, a relatively simple hardware-based improvement is
possible. Actually implementing it is left to the reader, and here's
what you need to know.
If you look closely at the K2 Control board schematic, you'll see that
the K2's fast AGC is obtained using an auxiliary I.F. of around 150
kHz. This is 100 times higher in frequency than the audio signal that
the K1 uses to drive its AGC detector, eliminating the rise-time
problem. The same technique could be used in the K1. You could start
with the K2's AGC circuit (mixer, amplifier, and detector), perhaps
breadboarding it on a proto board. You could pick off the 4.915 MHz
I.F. signal from the output of the K1's crystal filter, routing this to
another '602/'612 that has its oscillator running at 5.068 MHz (a
common crystal frequency). As in the K2, you'd then need to amplify and
detect just the 150-kHz difference product coming out of the mixer.
Various circuit simplifications may be possible relative to the K2's
circuit, which also includes manual RF gain control, T/R swiching, and
AGC on/off control.
An important subtlety: optimal results might require gain-controlling
the auxiliary I.F. mixer at pin 2, using the same derived AGC signal
that drives pin 2 of the K1's RX mixer and product detector. This would
ensure that the aux I.F. mixer's gain is scaled downward at the same
rate as the product detector as signal voltage goes up. This was not
necessary in the K2 case, because the I.F. amp (MC1350) is the only
gain-controlled stage, and it is ahead of the auxiliary I.F. mixer.
If anyone tries this and succeeds in creating very fast AGC for the K1,
we'd be happy to publish it as an application note on the web site. Who
knows? It might even make a nice little option module. The entire
circuit, if done using SMD parts, could fit on a board placed
underneath the K1's RF board.
I'd do it myself, but I'm a bit busy :)
73,
Wayne
N6KR
---
http://www.elecraft.com
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
