Why not ground the antenna and feed it as a Unipole? Most AM BC
stations are doing that these days. They also use a remote tuner,
although it is usually a fixed network as they only use one frequency.
That way the reflected power on the line is nil.
73
Bob, K4TAX
On 2/13/2018 12:29 PM,
I have been using MFJ tuners outside (MFJ-927) on a 43' vertical in
southwest Florida for many years. The only complaint I have is that they
don't get along with thunderstorms. I've probably gone through half dozen
of these over the years. However, it's worth it to me because when they
work,
om>
To: "John W2XS" <jm...@optonline.net>
Cc: "<elecraft@mailman.qth.net>" <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: 2/13/2018 8:55:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Suggestions needed - antenna to tuner
I have a very similar setup. K3 -> KPA500 -> MFJ 994BRT 6
I was thinking of a similar remote setup, wondering which remote autotuner
is recommended?
Thanks,
Frank w4tg
On Feb 13, 2018 8:56 AM, "Chris Hallinan" wrote:
> I have a very similar setup. K3 -> KPA500 -> MFJ 994BRT 600W autotuner
> mounted remote -> Balun Designs 4:1 ->
Have you tried adding some additional length to the 600 ohm feedline? I
originally couldn't perfectly match 30 meters with the Johnson Matchbox and
added about 15 or 18 feet IIRC. That brought 30m into range and didn't mess
up the other bands too much. Since your worst band is 17m, you might
Thanks, Don,
Yes I understand the basics - the doublet is not typically used in a
"matched" configuration, thus the need for the tuner. If I understand
correctly, it can present from very low to very high impedances to the
tuner. I will try a 1:1 and/or adding some wire length. Also, as I
Chris,
Try a 1:1 balun instead of the 4:1. You are matching the impedance seen
at the shack end of the feedline, and that can vary from very low to
very high.
The impedance you have to match is NOT the characteristic impedance of
the feedline. The 600 ohm line simply acts as an impedance
Thanks, Bob. I'll do just that when I get a chance. And I might just try
the 1:1 also! I have an Array Solutions analyzer, been meaning to scan it
to see exactly what the tuner sees. All of this requires a ladder and some
creative juggling of tools/laptop etc. ;)
73
Chris
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018
Chris;
Add or remove about 6 ft of the open wire line. See if this helps the
17M issue.
I personally don't like the idea of using a 4:1 balun and much prefer a
1:1 current balun. With the 4:1, without measuring the Z on the coax
side, it may be the Z presented to the tuner is very low and
I have a very similar setup. K3 -> KPA500 -> MFJ 994BRT 600W autotuner
mounted remote -> Balun Designs 4:1 -> 600 Ohm open wire line to 80 m
doublet.
It works fantastic on 80-20, but will not tune better than about 2:1 on
17. I cannot use the KPA500 on 17 because the SWR is too high. Nothing
I have not seen any of their products, but a post on their website
indicates that they do not understand how common mode chokes work. The
result is that they sell stuff that won't burn up, but it won't do
anything useful either.
73, Jim K9YC
On 2/12/2018 7:29 AM, David Bunte wrote:
I am
I replaced my Johnson Matchbox with a Balun Designs tuner balun. The biggest
benefit is that the K3 ATU remembers the settings from band to band so the
QSY is very rapid. I love watching the DX spots come rolling through on my
N3FJP logging program and clicking on them to QSY to that frequency and
Alan,
Good questions. The Elecraft tuners can not be beat for what they
can tune, so the only real issue is how to transition to coax from open
wire/ladder line. Probably, the easiest is to use a 4:1 current balun to
make the transition. I would go with one that is rated at least 3KW. Why
I've used balanced line systems and tuners and baluns for years. In
general the 135 ft center fed wire with your choice of balanced line, I
use the vinyl covered 450 line from The Wireman, will work quite
well. I bring the line from the feed point of the antenna all the way
to the operating
Alan -
I am pleased with results I have gotten with units from BALUN DESIGNS.
Their 1161 & 1171 models are possible choices. I know some folks would
rather spend less and build their own, but if that is not your preference,
then look at these models.
Best of luck.
73 de Dave - K9FN
On Mon, Feb
MORE Info
As is I can work 80-10. Some bands are better then others but I can
work them all with an SWR in the 1:1 to 1.3:1 range.The fed line
is 450 window. The dipole is center fed.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Alan Lambert wrote:
> I could use a little advice
16 matches
Mail list logo