How is the Nanson and/or Baldwin non-monotonic? I've been trying to develop
an example where they are non-monotonic, but I'm having trouble.
_
Share your special parenting moments!
http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHMloc=us
Hi,
--- John Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
How is the Nanson and/or Baldwin non-monotonic? I've been trying to
develop
an example where they are non-monotonic, but I'm having trouble.
I don't have an example off the top of my head, but what happens is that
raising the winner alters the
It doesn't seem that Nanson or Baldwin has quite the same degree of problem
with monotonicity as IRV does. Is Baldwin/Nanson less non-monotonic?
From: Chris Benham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Election-Methods] How is the Nanson
John Wong wrote:
How is the Nanson and/or Baldwin non-monotonic? I've been trying to
develop an example where they are non-monotonic, but I'm having trouble.
I think this is an example of Borda Elimination (Baldwin?) failing
mono-raise.
31: AB
32: BC
03: AC
31: CA
03: CB
Borda scores: