Re: [Election-Methods] Challenge Problem

2008-06-06 Thread Jobst Heitzig
Dear Forest, I think the following modification of your method is both monotonic and performs better in the 33/33/33-situation: 1. We use approval ballots with favourite option indicated. We determine all approval scores. Assume the highest approval score divided by the number of voters is

Re: [Election-Methods] Partisan Politics + a method proposal

2008-06-06 Thread Fred Gohlke
Good Morning, Dave I think I owe you an apology. Somehow, I failed to make myself clear. What I sought to do was put some marks on a board so you (and others) could tell me how those marks should be changed to create a sound electoral process. I anticipated differences of opinion and

Re: [Election-Methods] Partisan Politics + a method proposal

2008-06-06 Thread Fred Gohlke
Good Morning, Juho I haven't been idle. As a result of my discussion with you and others, it occurred to me we should distinguish between the process of selecting candidates and the process of electing those candidates to office. That idea gradually took shape over the past couple of weeks,

Re: [Election-Methods] Partisan Politics + Candidate selection

2008-06-06 Thread James Gilmour
Fred, Juho I have changed the subject as this post (and my reply) appeared to address a specific subset of the problem. You MAY find it interesting to see what was said about candidate selection in a different but similar political system. The Electoral Reform Society asked an independent

Re: [Election-Methods] Partisan Politics + a method proposal

2008-06-06 Thread Juho
On Jun 6, 2008, at 17:53 , Fred Gohlke wrote: re: I just pointed out that it does not guarantee full proportional representation. This point seems to center on what one considers proportional. You appear to believe minorities should have representation in proportion to their size. I