Fred Gohlke in language/framing quibble wrote:
... a draft of the petition outlining a method of selecting
candidates for public office... PRACTICAL DEMOCRACY... Candidate
Selection By The People of Sefton...
Hi Fred,
Could the method leave electors feeling left out? Suppose I am an
Here's the Practical Democracy method (Fred Gohlke, in thread
language/framing quibble). I'll show just three process steps (or
levels), culminating in the final selection (AA) at step 3.
Practical:
-
1
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (O) (P) (Q) (R)
Hello all,
thanks for your comments so far. I have not yet improved the interface
much yet but have instead implemented a second web service.
While the first one was for immediate use by groups who are already
convened in one place and provided no secrecy, this second
implementation is for
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Fred Gohlke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
re: (About explaining the worst case, where all except a minority
gets removed), Ahh, I did with the religious minority?
As I said in my response to that explanation, the reasoning is seriously
flawed. It is based on
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 3:34 AM, Michael Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raph Frank wrote:
V(N) is the value per user if N users are using the system.
P(V) is the number of people who would use the system if it had value V
C = cost per user (time, direct cost etc.)
V increases with N and P
