Good Morning, Juho
re: [my comment] If we design a process that does not require
campaigning, the evils of campaigning will be avoided.
[you asked] How will you do that?
The method outlined in my February 4, 2008 post, Selecting Leaders From
The People does not require campaigning.
Juho Laatu wrote:
(I limit the scope of discussion to
single-winner elections, and exlude
primaries and other party internal
candidate selection and hierarchical
proxy based methods.)
. . .
One approach is to use a candidate
tree where the votes (to individual
candidates) are summed
Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
Juho Laatu wrote:
One approach is to use a candidate
tree...
One could also have a series of runoffs...
Instead of a parallel of runoffs, which is the tree.
Fred's method could be used to select a single winner. Would you call it a
hierarchical proxy? ...
Juho Laatu wrote:
Several cents might make a dollar.
There are many small problems that
together may make the system fall
short of the planned ideal state.
Or that together, might not.
In arguing that DD is probable, we brought in many factors. But we
also detailed how they interrelate, and
Good Afternoon, James
re: The person 'they want' may well not want the job.
That is not a flaw, it is a fact of political life. However, we have no
right to assume people don't want the job. We must give everyone an
opportunity to seek it. Those who do not want it will make the fact
--- On Fri, 6/3/09, Kristofer Munsterhjelm km-el...@broadpark.no wrote:
Juho Laatu wrote:
Is the target here to have a method
that would allow and encourage having
multiple candidates? (to allow the
people of Owego to select the winner
themselves instead of others/parties
telling
--- On Fri, 6/3/09, Fred Gohlke fredgoh...@verizon.net wrote:
Good Morning, Juho
re: [my comment] If we design a process that does not
require
campaigning, the evils of campaigning will be
avoided.
[you asked] How will you do that?
The method outlined in my February 4, 2008
--- On Fri, 6/3/09, Michael Allan m...@zelea.com wrote:
Juho Laatu wrote:
Several cents might make a dollar.
There are many small problems that
together may make the system fall
short of the planned ideal state.
Or that together, might not.
In arguing that DD is probable, we
