Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote (14 Jan 2010):
snip
Why does Kathy elsewhere defend Top Two Runoff which isn't monotonic?
This opinion, stated as fact, is false. Top Two Runoff is a two-step
system, and monotonicity doesn't refer to such. It refers to the
effect of a vote on a single ballot as to
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:44 AM, robert bristow-johnson
r...@audioimagination.com wrote:
Kathy may make mistakes, but I'd be astonished to find her lying.
she's pretty partisan (as am i), now i don't even remember what she said
that i found so hard to believe.
Really!!?? Since I've never
On Jan 15, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Kathy Dopp wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:44 AM, robert bristow-johnson
r...@audioimagination.com wrote:
Kathy may make mistakes, but I'd be astonished to find her lying.
she's pretty partisan (as am i), now i don't even remember what
she said
that i found
Oh. OK. I thought you were using the word partisan in the typical
sense of political party adherent which I am not.
OK. I agree that I am a strong adherent of voting rights so naturally
oppose IRV/STV as removing the rights of voters to participate in the
final decision-making process, removing
At 10:51 PM 1/14/2010, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
On Jan 14, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Again, as I mentioned, the Condorcet Criterion looks good, it's
intuitively satisfying. Unfortunately, it depends on pure rank
order, neglecting preference strength.
Just for the record:
On Jan 15, 2010, at 7:46 PM, Juho wrote:
On Jan 14, 2010, at 2:13 AM, Dave Ketchum wrote:
On Jan 13, 2010, at 4:49 AM, Juho wrote:
On Jan 13, 2010, at 9:14 AM, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
it still is a curiosity to me how, historically, some leaders and
proponents of election reform
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:05:58 -0500
From: Dave Ketchum da...@clarityconnect.com
To: Juho juho4...@yahoo.co.uk
On Jan 15, 2010, at 7:46 PM, Juho wrote:
On Jan 14, 2010, at 2:13 AM, Dave Ketchum wrote:
On Jan 13, 2010, at 4:49 AM, Juho wrote:
On Jan 13, 2010, at 9:14 AM, robert
On Jan 15, 2010, at 7:51 PM, Kathy Dopp wrote:
Imagine sending all your ballots nationwide to DC for manual counting
to check the outcome of a Presidential election. We'll simply let the
GW administration, for instance, count the results in his own IRV
election!
That's something of a non
On Jan 15, 2010, at 11:34 PM, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
On Jan 15, 2010, at 7:51 PM, Kathy Dopp wrote:
Imagine sending all your ballots nationwide to DC for manual counting
to check the outcome of a Presidential election. We'll simply let the
GW administration, for instance, count the results
