If the argument of this essay is sound, then it may have some bearing
on how we advocate for particular voting methods in future.
Otherwise, I'm afraid it may be a little off topic. I hope to re-post
it soon to a larger, more Internet-related list - if it can stand up
to critique. Can anyone see
In HBH a pecking order is established on the basis of implicit approval or some
other monotonic, clone
consistent order like chiastic approval that has no incentive for order
reversals and minimal incentive for
collapsing (i.e. merging) of ratings.
A monotone, clone consistent measure of
