On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:10 PM,
election-methods-requ...@lists.electorama.com wrote:
Send Election-Methods mailing list submissions to
election-methods@lists.electorama.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
Jameson:
I'd said:
Say my sincere ratings are:
x: 100
y: 90
(other candidates considerably lower)
Your sincere ratings are:
y: 100
x: 90
(other candidates considerably lower)
x and y are similar, but different enough to be supported by
different factions.
This situation is
Earlier I mentioned that I had found a way of making my Bucklin
multiwinner method more managable - more sequential. I did not, however,
say exactly how I had done that.
So why not do that here?
Consider my previous version of the Bucklin multiwinner method (for
which I still haven't found a
On 02/10/2012 11:02 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
We can add a candidate C_k to PC if there exists a subset (coalition)
that supports at least k+1 candidates, where k is the cardinality of the
intersection of PC and that coalition, and that coalition also contains
C_k.
Oops, seems I reused
Hi Kristofer,
I am very interested in PR multiwinner methods, especially those that
use ER-Bucklin.
However, I have a hard time following your logic.
Would it be possible to work out a relatively simple example using a 3
winner election, a Droop-like quota of 25% (just to make things easy),
and
