-- Forwarded message --
From: Juho Laatu juho4...@yahoo.co.uk
dlw: But I'd argue that to make our two-party system work better, we need
to provide a constructive role for 3rd parties in it. This wd be
accomplished by the use of 3-seat LR Hare in state reps elections. If the
On 02/10/2012 11:18 PM, Ted Stern wrote:
Hi Kristofer,
I am very interested in PR multiwinner methods, especially those that
use ER-Bucklin.
However, I have a hard time following your logic.
Would it be possible to work out a relatively simple example using a 3
winner election, a Droop-like
On 13.2.2012, at 16.28, David L Wetzell wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Juho Laatu juho4...@yahoo.co.uk
dlw: But I'd argue that to make our two-party system work better, we need
to provide a constructive role for 3rd parties in it. This wd be
accomplished by the use
It seems like the awesomeness of using PR for part of the seats somehow
makes up for the lousiness of FPTP for the rest of the seats.
But why not use IRV+ for the rest? I mean it's not unlike FPTP in how it
tends to favor bigger parties. According to George
