[EM] IIDA: IIA and SODA delegation

2012-03-29 Thread Jameson Quinn
The Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives criterion (IIA, also sometimes abbreviated IIAC) is a bit of a silly criterion. Arguably, no system really passes it. For any ranked system, just take a simple ABCA 3-candidate Condorcet cycle, and then remove the irrelevant candidate who loses to the

Re: [EM] IIDA: IIA and SODA delegation

2012-03-29 Thread Ted Stern
It is my impression that the only situations in which IIAC fails is when there is no majority. Would it be possible to get around IIAC by adding a two-candidate runoff? Ted On 29 Mar 2012 05:35:47 -0700, Jameson Quinn wrote: The Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives criterion (IIA, also

Re: [EM] IIDA: IIA and SODA delegation

2012-03-29 Thread Kristofer Munsterhjelm
On 03/29/2012 09:41 PM, Ted Stern wrote: It is my impression that the only situations in which IIAC fails is when there is no majority. Would it be possible to get around IIAC by adding a two-candidate runoff? I don't think so. In a subset of all possible two-round elections, the voters are