Re: [EM] Forced strictly-dishonest strategy is common in Schulze-beatpaths voting

% of voters might -- a posteriori -- gain expected utility from strategic order reversal, to conclude how they would feel about that requires an argument that they care more about the vanishingly small gain in utility than they do about honesty in voting. Michael Poole Election-Methods mailing

Re: [EM] Why the concept of sincere votes in Range is flawed.

, and the further error of claiming that neither approval nor range systems are ever vulnerable to strategic voting -- rather than restricting the hypothesis to sincere votes. Michael Poole Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Re: [EM] Why the concept of sincere votes in Range is flawed.

credibility. Michael Poole Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info