Marcus,
You wrote (25 Dec. 2008):
Dear Chris Benham,
you wrote (25 Dec 2008):
I had already proposed this criterion in 1997.
Why then do you list it as Woodall's CDTT criterion
instead of your own Generalised Majority Criterion?
Did, as far as you know, Woodall ever actually proposethe CDTT
Dear Chris Benham,
you wrote (25 Dec 2008):
I had already proposed this criterion in 1997.
Why then do you list it as Woodall's CDTT criterion
instead of your own Generalised Majority Criterion?
Did, as far as you know, Woodall ever actually propose
the CDTT criterion as something that is
Hi Chris,
--- En date de : Jeu 25.12.08, Chris Benham cbenha...@yahoo.com.au a écrit :
Did, as far as you know, Woodall ever actually propose
the CDTT criterion as something that is
desirable for
methods to meet (instead of just defining the CDTT set)?
One thing is that Woodall thought the
Dear Chris Benham,
you wrote (23 Dec 2008):
In one of your recent papers and on the Schulze
method Wikipedia page you list Woodall's CDTT
criterion as one of the criteria satisfied by
the Schulze (Winning Votes) method.
What, in your opinion, is supposed to be the
positive point of
