On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Michael Rouse wrote:
> It seemed like an interesting idea, but the drawbacks mentioned included the
> possibility of non-payment and the problem of secrecy.
The main problem is actually that the chances of you actually having
to pay is extremely low.
> Bingo, ca
I was perusing the rangevoting.org site (hi, Warren! :) ) after the
latest IRV argument, and I came across something I remembered vaguely
but thought was quite interesting, namely the
"Clarke-Groves-Tideman-Tullock 'perfect' scheme for voting with money"
(link here: http://scorevoting.net/CTT.
