Good Morning, Michael
Thank you for that.
If I made my presentation in a way that could be misunderstood, the
error is mine. If you misunderstood, others will too, and that's a flaw
in the presentation.
I appreciate your gracious offer of a truce, but deeply regret
conducting myself in a
Good Morning, Michael
(your message of Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:29:35)
re: My recommendation was therefore to set up an *alternative*
electoral system in parallel with the existing systems
(primary and principal). It would give electors a different
means of selection. Their
Truce Fred,
Whatever my critique of Practical Democracy, it may well stem from a
misunderstanding. No need digging for the root of it.
Peace,
--
Michael Allan
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
Good Morning, Michael
(First of all, I just found a message from you to me on September 8th.
I ran across it by accident. I apologize for missing it. Perhaps it
would be better if you clicked on the link with my name at the very top
of my posts. When you do that your message comes to me by
Fred Gohlke in language/framing quibble wrote:
... a draft of the petition outlining a method of selecting
candidates for public office... PRACTICAL DEMOCRACY... Candidate
Selection By The People of Sefton...
Hi Fred,
Could the method leave electors feeling left out? Suppose I am an
