It seems to me that Ranked-Pairs(margins) and Beatpath(margins) meet 0-Info Sincerity, along with IRV and Approval.
It also now seems ot me that (as I said in a recent posting) the detailed information needed for ranking other than 0-info will typically be unavailable in Condorcet. ...except for the special (currently-existing) case in which most people have been convinced that the Democrat is acceptable, and that the winner must be a Democrat or a Republican, in which case, in Ranked-Pairs, Beatpath, and all TUC methods, the optimal strategy consists of ranking the Democrat alone in 1st place. So, though I used to say that wv is more burial-resistant than margins, maybe TUC(margins) is better than TUC(wv), because the idetailed nformation needed for offensive burial won't be available. But of course, if TUC(margins)'s Plurality Criterion failure is permissible, then why not just use MMPO instead. MMPO meets FBC, LNHa and CD. No Ranked-Pairs, Beatpath, or other TUC method is good enough, because, with our current electorate, FBC is necessary. Also, there's no excuse for a rank method to fail CD. Mike Ossipooff ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
