Re: [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods

2008-11-07 Thread Kathy Dopp
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Stéphane Rouillon Exactly, no electoral system can garantee coherence between the order of preferences of a voter and the impact the participation of that voter has on the result. Yea Right! The vote counting method that is employed cannot guarantee the

Re: [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods

2008-11-06 Thread Kathy Dopp
Stephane, You are confusing the spoiler effect with monotonicity. Plurality voting is ALWAYS monotonic. Neither IRV or plurality solve the spoiler problem. Both are susceptible to strategizing. I don't know any voting method that is not. Does anyone have anything helpful to add? Kathy On

Re: [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods

2008-11-06 Thread Jonathan Lundell
On Nov 6, 2008, at 8:26 PM, Kathy Dopp wrote: Both are susceptible to strategizing. I don't know any voting method that is not. Random Dictator. Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info