Very bad is the Supplementary Vote used to elect some
mayors in the UK. It is like the Contingent Vote (one trip to
the polls TTR) except voters are only allowed to rank 2 candidates.
Kevin Venzke wrote:
I don't see how this is very bad. I could see how you might think it
is easily
I don't see antiplurality as much worse than FPP.
Antiplurality (vote against one, candidate with fewest votes wins) meets
Majority Loser and Strong Favourite Betrayal.
Very bad is the Supplementary Vote used to elect some mayors in the
UK. It is like the Contingent Vote (one trip to the
Hi Chris,
--- En date de : Jeu 16.10.08, Chris Benham [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
De: Chris Benham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet: [EM] Worst Voting Method
À: EM election-methods@lists.electorama.com
Date: Jeudi 16 Octobre 2008, 1h45
I don't see antiplurality as much worse than FPP
What is the worst voting method of all time?
I suggest methods already made up
I suggest antiplurality, if that doesn't count, then... hmmm... North
Carolina's weird version of IRV.
http://www.fairvote.org/irv/?page=21articlemode=showspecificshowarticle=2229
40% to win? 40%?! WHY?
