Re: [Election-Methods] Bullet Voting in the wider media

2007-10-12 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 11:37 AM 10/12/2007, Chris Benham wrote: We know that Condorcet methods are vulnerable to Burial and Compromise, and that Range is vulnerable to Burial and what has been called Compromise-compression (incentive to falsely vote one or more candidates equal-top alongside the voter's true

Re: [Election-Methods] Bullet Voting in the wider media

2007-10-11 Thread Gervase Lam
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:00:23 -0700 From: Jonathan Lundell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Election-Methods] Bullet Voting in the wider media On Oct 8, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Gervase Lam wrote: Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 17:34:10 -0700 From: Jonathan Lundell Subject: Re: [Election-Methods

Re: [Election-Methods] Bullet Voting in the wider media

2007-10-09 Thread Chris Benham
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: If you don't want to use the term sincere here, that's fine by me; let's use something else. Let's find some term that describes an ideal method in which a voter can express his true (dictatorial, perhaps benevolently so, perhaps not) preferences without worrying

Re: [Election-Methods] Bullet Voting in the wider media

2007-10-09 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 11:03 AM 10/9/2007, Chris Benham wrote: Abd, What do you propose if the Range winner is pairwise beaten by more than one candidate? Chris Benham An obvious question of great interest to election methods experts. Not of much interest practically speaking. If it is sum-of-votes range,

Re: [Election-Methods] Bullet Voting in the wider media

2007-10-08 Thread Jonathan Lundell
On Oct 7, 2007, at 8:31 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: At 08:34 PM 10/7/2007, Jonathan Lundell wrote: The term insincere is an unfortunate shorthand for something other than the usual dictionary meaning. In this form of election, I take it to mean voting, for strategic reasons, for other

Re: [Election-Methods] Bullet Voting in the wider media

2007-10-08 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 07:04 PM 10/8/2007, Jonathan Lundell wrote: Are we saying that a bullet vote for Abraham Lincoln is insincere? Why? The voter has essentially set an approval cutoff between Abraham Lincoln and Adolf Hitler. In this case, that isn't even questionable, it is quite sincere. Which is exactly what

Re: [Election-Methods] Bullet Voting in the wider media

2007-10-08 Thread Juho
On Oct 9, 2007, at 4:00 , Jonathan Lundell wrote: On Oct 8, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Gervase Lam wrote: Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 17:34:10 -0700 From: Jonathan Lundell Subject: Re: [Election-Methods] Bullet Voting in the wider media On Oct 7, 2007, at 5:01 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: At 11:53 AM

[Election-Methods] Bullet Voting in the wider media

2007-10-07 Thread Brian Olson
In case anyone's interested in what the general public are hearing about voting strategy. http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/10/07/ ballot_query_to_bullet_or_not_to_bullet Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info