[EM] Multiwinner Bucklin - proportional, summable (n^3), monotonic (if fully-enough ranked)

Jameson Quinn wrote (26 March 2010): snip Right now, I think MCV - that is, two-rank, equality-allowed Bucklin, with top-two runoffs if no candidate receives a majority of approvals in those two ranks - is my favorite proposal for practical implementation. snip Jameson, What does MCV stand

Re: [EM] Multiwinner Bucklin - proportional, summable (n^3), monotonic (if fully-enough ranked)

2010/3/28 Chris Benham cbenha...@yahoo.com.au Jameson Quinn wrote (26 March 2010): snip Right now, I think MCV - that is, two-rank, equality-allowed Bucklin, with top-two runoffs if no candidate receives a majority of approvals in those two ranks - is my favorite proposal for practical

[EM] Proportional representation through Bucklin-STV/Asset

I'm copying this from a post of mine sent yesterday, on the list at Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:55:49 -0400. I'd like to get specific comment on this method. I use the Hare quota, generally, with Asset methods, because it provides natural consequences for inability to compromise. The loss of a seat is