Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 05:57 AM 4/8/2010, Raph Frank wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Dave Ketchum
da...@clarityconnect.com wrote:
Write-ins permitted (if few write-ins expected,
counters may lump all such as if a single candidate - if assumption
correct
the count verifies
MMPO minimizes the maximum pairwise opposition, so in some sense tries to
minimize the total
disappointment that results from the MMPO winner being elected instead of some
other candidate.
If strict rankings are not required (so that favorite and compromise can be
ranked equal first), then
On Apr 9, 2010, at 3:03 AM, Kevin Venzke wrote:
Hi Juho,
--- En date de : Jeu 8.4.10, Juho juho4...@yahoo.co.uk a écrit :
I more or less despise the election of A in this
scenario:
49 A
24 B
27 CB
I believe the possibility of this outcome is a
disincentive for a candidate
like C to run.
Hi Juho,
--- En date de : Ven 9.4.10, Juho juho4...@yahoo.co.uk a écrit :
I more or less despise the election of A in
this
scenario:
49 A
24 B
27 CB
I believe the possibility of this outcome is
a
disincentive for a candidate
like C to run.
The story behind these votes
fsimm...@pcc.edu wrote:
MMPO minimizes the maximum pairwise opposition, so in some sense tries to minimize the total
disappointment that results from the MMPO winner being elected instead of some other candidate.
(...)
In general no matter who wins, there will be disappointed voters. Why not
On Apr 9, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Juho wrote:
On Apr 9, 2010, at 3:03 AM, Kevin Venzke wrote:
Hi Juho,
--- En date de : Jeu 8.4.10, Juho juho4...@yahoo.co.uk a écrit :
I more or less despise the election of A in this
scenario:
49 A
24 B
27 CB
I believe the possibility of this outcome is a
At 03:55 AM 4/9/2010, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
I'll note here that Bucklin is not cloneproof, and in some cases it
can reward cloning. See
http://www.mail-archive.com/election-methods-electorama@electorama.com/msg02705.html
. Thus it might pay for voters of some opinion to add lots
